Back

Stochastic gates for covariate selection in population pharmacokinetics modelling

Kekic, M.; Stepanov, O.; Wang, W.; Richardson, S.; Olabode, D.; Traynor, C.; Dearden, R.; Zhou, D.; Tang, W.; Gibbs, M.; Nowojewski, A.

2025-06-01 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.05.28.656586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Covariate selection in population pharmacokinetics modelling is essential for understanding interindividual variability in drug response and optimizing dosing. Traditional stepwise covariate modelling is often time-consuming, compared to the new machine learning alternatives. This study investigates the use of Neural Networks with Stochastic Gates for automated covariate selection, aiming to efficiently identify relevant covariates while penalizing excessive covariate inclusion. On various synthetic datasets the approach demonstrated robustness in detecting important covariates, overcoming challenges such as high correlations, low covariate frequencies, high interindividual variability and complex covariate dependencies. In real clinical data from a monalizumab study, the method successfully identified covariates that matched those found by experts. However, for tixagevimab/cilgavimab, it identified a superset of covariates, indicating a potential need for further pruning. This machine learning-based method enhances the covariate pre-selection process in population pharmacokinetics model development, offering significant time savings and improving efficiency even under challenging scenarios. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=89 SRC="FIGDIR/small/656586v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f5180borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fd97e7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ffc3d0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@90c207_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Study HighlightsO_ST_ABSWHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?C_ST_ABSCovariate selection in population pharmacokinetics modelling is a crucial step in drug development and dosing determination. Traditionally, this process is conducted in a stepwise manner, which can be very time-consuming. Recently, fast machine learning (ML)-based methods for covariate selection have emerged in the literature, offering more efficient alternatives. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?Can we use Neural Networks with Stochastic Gates, incorporating explicit penalization on the number of covariates, to select superior set of covariates compared to prior ML-based methods? WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?Neural Networks with Stochastic Gates provide a reliable approach in accurately detecting covariates because they can effectively eliminate irrelevant covariates even in cases with high inter-covariates correlation. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE DRUG DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT, AND/OR THERAPEUTICS?This approach accelerates pharmacokinetic model development by significantly reducing the time required for covariate evaluation. Additionally, it allows for the screening of a wider set of covariates, potentially leading to fewer falsely missed covariates and better-quality models, a task that would be infeasible with traditional stepwise covariate modelling.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.4%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.5%
4
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%