Back

EnhancerDetector: Enhancer Discovery from Human to Fly via Interpretable Deep Learning

Solis, L. M.; Sterling-Lentsch, G.; Halfon, M. S.; Girgis, H. Z.

2025-05-31 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.28.656532 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deciphering how enhancers encode regulatory information in DNA remains a central genomics challenge, as sequencing outpaces functional annotation. A key question is whether enhancers possess an intrinsic, sequence-based "enhancerness" distinguishing them from other regions, independent of species, cell type, or assay. Confirming its existence and learnability is both biologically fundamental and essential for scalable genome annotation. We introduce EnhancerDetector, a convolutional neural network-based framework for cross-species enhancer prediction that combines high accuracy with biological interpretability. Trained on human data, EnhancerDetector achieves strong performance across human, mouse, and fly datasets, consistently outperforming existing methods in precision and F1. It generalizes to datasets generated using diverse experimental assays. Unlike chromatin feature-based predictors requiring complex post hoc thresholding, EnhancerDetector directly outputs enhancer probability scores from short sequence windows, simplifying enhancer discovery workflows. An ensemble strategy further improves prediction reliability by reducing false positives. EnhancerDetector supports fine-tuning on new species and retains strong performance even when adapted with as few as 20,000 enhancer sequences, making it ideal for newly sequenced genomes with limited experimental data. For interpretability and visualization, we apply class activation maps to identify sequence regions predictive of enhancer activity. Experimental validation in transgenic flies confirms the predictive power of EnhancerDetector: five of six tested candidates drove reporter expression, and four exhibited expression patterns supported by prior literature. These analyses highlight distinct sequence and contextual features that confer what we term "enhancerness:" enhancer sequences possess a characteristic, identifiable signature.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.