Back

ECgo: All-Optical Induction of Single Endothelial Cell Injury and Capillary Occlusion in the Brain

Condrau, J.; Allu, S. R.; Esipova, T. V.; Erlebach, E.; Wyss, M. T.; Glueck, C.; Ravotto, L.; Troxler, T.; Villa, M.; Ceroni, P.; El Amki, M.; Vinogradov, S. A.; Weber, B.

2025-05-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.27.656398 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to induce endothelial cell (EC) damage in the mouse brain with high spatial precision is invaluable for mechanistic studies of brain capillary injury and repair. Here, we introduce an optical method, termed ECgo, that utilizes a new two-photon-excitable porphyrin-based photosensitizer (Ps2P) to selectively obliterate single ECs within the brain microvascular network. Using the developed approach, we were able to induce occlusions of single capillaries with high spatiotemporal control, while preserving the surrounding tissue. Combined with longitudinal two-photon imaging, ECgo enables studies of morphological and functional consequences of targeted single capillary EC injury in vivo under healthy and diseased conditions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTBrain capillary injury is a common feature of aging and many neurological disorders. While a single capillary lesion may appear inconsequential, the cumulative effect of repeated and spatially dispersed capillary insults can lead to substantial brain dysfunction. Understanding how single capillary injuries contribute cumulatively to long-term brain damage requires tools that can precisely target individual capillaries in the living brain. Here, we introduce an optical method that uses a new light-activatable compound to selectively injure single brain capillaries with high spatial accuracy. Our method enables detailed, longitudinal studies of capillary repair, blood flow recovery, local oxygen dynamics, and glial responses following microvascular injury.

Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.