Back

Functionally distinct ALK and ROS1 fusions detected in infant-type hemispheric gliomas converge on STAT3 and SHP2 activation

Postlmayr, A.; Sanchez Bergman, A.; Torrejon Diaz, J.; Ciraulo, B.; Yan, S.; Hofmann, N.; Carbajal, S.; Dobler, R.; Machaalani, C.; Priego-Gonzalez, L.; De Micheli, A. J.; Berenjeno-Correa, E.; Baroncini, L.; Grotzer, M. A.; Tabori, U.; Hawkins, C.; Ayrault, O.; Zuckermann, M.; Baumgartner, M.; Guerreiro Stuecklin, A. S.

2025-05-31 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.05.27.656302 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ALK and ROS1 fusions are emerging as key drivers of infant-type hemispheric gliomas (IHG). With diverse gene partners, the impact of ALK and ROS1 oncoprotein heterogeneity on glioma biology remains unknown. We developed an integrative phospho-proteomic and transcriptomic approach to discover biological functions regulated by five IHG-associated fusions: CCDC88A::ALK, PPP1CB::ALK, GOPC::ROS1, CLIP1::ROS1 and KIF21A::ROS1. Here, we report fusion-specific oncogenic functions conferred by the 5 gene partner, including increased cell motility driven by microtubule-interacting fusions CCDC88A::ALK and CLIP1::ROS1. All studied fusions converged on a non-canonical STAT3 activation. Using affinity purification mass spectrometry, we identify SHP2 in direct interaction with all three ROS1 oncoproteins, but with none of the ALK oncoproteins, which in turn interact with SHC1/SHC3. ROS1 fusions phosphorylated SHP2 to a larger extent than ALK fusions, and analyses of downstream pathways suggested MAPK-independent, non-canonical SHP2-driven functions. Our findings reveal both common and fusion-specific dependencies, offering opportunities to optimize therapeutic strategies for pediatric gliomas.

Published in Cell Reports (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.