Back

Infanticide in a colonial cooperative bird is not associated with direct reproductive benefits

Covas, R.; Silva, L. R.; Ferreira, A. C.; D'Amelio, P. B.; Fortuna, R.; DuVal, D.; Paquet, M.; Doutrelant, C.

2025-07-31 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.05.27.656097 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Infanticide, the killing of dependent young by adult conspecifics, is an extreme form of conflict that remains poorly understood. Previous studies suggest that it is associated with reproductive benefits, either by making breeders newly available for reproduction or by increasing offspring care and reducing competition for resources. In addition, infanticide may result from a reproductive trade-off, where parents kill their offspring if environmental conditions compromise their reproductive value. Here, we combine video, genetic and individual-level reproductive data collected over 12 years to describe infanticide in a highly social, cooperative bird, the sociable weaver Philetairus socius and to establish whether direct reproductive benefits or life-history trade-offs are possible motivators for this behaviour. We documented 50 cases of infanticide and identified 27 aggressors with known histories. These were mostly born outside the colonies where they committed infanticide (63%) and there was a bias towards younger individuals. Aggressors were usually not part of the victims breeding group (74%), but in two cases infanticide was committed by the breeding female, and in five by helpers. In most cases, aggressors were not reproducing at the time of the infanticide, were not recorded mating with any of the breeders or helpers from the attacked nest, nor occupied the nest from where the chicks were evicted. Only 13 of the known aggressors were confirmed as breeders after the attacks, and these mostly reproduced at the colony where the attacks were committed. Overall, we found no evidence for direct reproductive benefits of infanticide in sociable weavers. However, the younger age of aggressors, lack of genetic relatedness to the victims and future breeding at the colony suggest that competition between breeding groups, and hence indirect reproductive benefits, could provide motivation for infanticide in this population. Additional work over longer periods is needed to identify these possible indirect fitness benefits of infanticide.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
20
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%