Back

Crowdsourced Wildlife Observations Uncover Ecotourism Assets-Sites and Species

Atsumi, K.; Tsujino, T.; Nakaseko, M.; Ogasawara, S.; Tsuboi, R.; Taga, H.; Nishida, T.

2025-05-30 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.26.656219 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ecotourism plays a vital role in conserving ecosystems and revitalising rural economies. Sustainable management requires strategies that effectively balance conservation needs with tourism promotion, necessitating a clear understanding of which landscapes and species attract visitors. However, identifying these "charismatic" assets has traditionally relied on costly and spatially limited surveys. This study leverages crowdsourced biodiversity data from digital platforms (iNaturalist and Biome) to identify nature-based recreation sites and visitor-preferred species in Inabe City, a rural Japanese municipality with high recreational visitation. We analysed 12,764 observations within the city and 238,625 reference observations from across Japan. By applying the Out-of-Area Activity Index (OAAI) to biological recording data, we distinguished visitors from residents with high accuracy. Spatial analyses using hurdle models revealed distinct preferences: while both groups frequented recreational facilities, residents concentrated on lowland forests, whereas visitors were significantly drawn to wetlands and mountain habitats. To quantify specific biological interests, we developed the Visitor Preference Index (VPI). This index highlighted that visitors disproportionately recorded aquatic insects (e.g., dragonflies) and endangered understory plants compared to their observations elsewhere, identifying these taxa as key ecological assets. These findings underscore the critical importance of managing highland forests and wetlands--habitats often vulnerable to degradation--to support both biodiversity and tourism. This study illustrates how crowdsourced biodiversity data can contribute to understanding human-nature interactions and offer a scalable tool for regional planning that integrates ecological conservation with sustainable tourism development.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
3
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.6%
20
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%