Back

Spatial covariation between wild boars and other mammals in peri-urban landscapes: insights for management from southern France

Barachin, L.; Dezeure, J.; Said, S.; Mathevet, R.; Baubet, E.; Chamaille-Jammes, S.

2025-09-11 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.26.656147 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global urbanization is rapidly increasing, transforming ecosystems and favoring generalist species that adapt to human-modified environments. The wild boar, a highly adaptable species, is expanding its range and increasingly observed in urban and peri-urban areas, where it can cause accidents, damage, and health concerns. To mitigate their presence, non-lethal control strategies such as vegetation clearing in peri-urban parks and wastelands are being implemented to reduce the number of suitable resting sites. However, the ecological consequences of such habitat modifications on other wildlife species remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap limits the development of effective urban wildlife management strategies that seeks to balance ecological, social and economic considerations without harming wild boar populations and urban ecosystems. In this context, we used camera trapping to study the covariation between wild boars and other mammal species in a peri-urban area, with the aim of guiding targeted and effective management strategies. Here, we show a widespread presence of wild boars but no spatial or temporal covariation between the wild boars and the other species. In contrast, we found strong spatial structuring in mammal communities, primarily driven by small carnivores (mustelids, genets, cats, foxes) and a minimal influence of temporal variation, confirming that spatial factors, rather than seasonal changes, largely shaped species distributions. The study of the temporal variation across months indicated minimal seasonal structuring but revealed substantial within-site variability in month-to-month species abundance, with a general abundance gradient driven by common species like wild boar, cat, and fox. In conclusion, our results show that the lack of spatial covariation between wild boar and other species prevents reliable predictions, supporting a targeted rather than general approach to vegetation management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
6
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
16
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
21
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%