A case-cohort longitudinal study for the analysis of microbial associations and viruses on the risk of celiac disease (MAVRiC)
Lynch, K. F.; Triplett, E. W.; Hyöty, H.; Ahrens, A. P.; Laiho, J. E.; Petrosino, J. F.; Lloyd, R. E.; Agardh, D.
Show abstract
Celiac disease etiopathogenesis requires genetic predisposition and exposure to gluten before a child can develop the chronic autoimmune disorder. However, these factors alone are not sufficient. Even a child with persistent tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies (tTGA), i.e., celiac disease autoimmunity (CDA), does not necessarily develop celiac disease. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to determine the impact of time-varying infections and gut microorganisms on the subsequent and specific risk of celiac disease. The aim was to design a celiac disease case-cohort longitudinal study using The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study. Following the TEDDY cohort up age 3-years, CDA was confirmed in 704 of the 6132 genetically at-risk children. Celiac disease onset was defined as the age CDA developed when followed by a biopsy-proven diagnosis. A competing risk analysis was performed on celiac disease onset cases (CD-onset) as well as CDA children with no diagnosis (CDA-only) and results show genetic factors (additional HLA-DR3-DQ2 haplotype, higher non-HLA polygenic risk score, sex-girl) and a more rapid increase in gluten-consumption correlate with significant increased risk of both outcomes. However, reports of virus-related respiratory infections in August to October during follow-up correlated with an increased risk of a CD-onset but not with CDA-only. To create a case-cohort study, a sub-cohort of 561 children (9% sampling fraction) was first randomly selected to represent the TEDDY cohort over time while at risk of CDA. It included 483 children followed until age 3-years and 78 children followed before developing CDA (CDA-only n=41/78, CD-onset n=37/78). All incident CD-onset children (N=306) were included to form the case group. This case-cohort will be utilized to analyze virus antibodies and bacteriome from longitudinal plasma and stool samples (the Microbial Associations and Viruses on the Risk of Celiac disease study, MAVRiC).
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence and etiology of clinically-attended, antibiotic-treated diarrhea among children under five years of age in low- and middle-income countries: evidence from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study 90%
- Mucosal-Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cells are Highly Activated in Duodenal Tissue of Humans with Vibrio cholerae O1 Infection 90%
- Clinical predictors for etiology of acute diarrhea in children in resource-limited settings 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clonal overlap and convergent clustering of T-cell receptor signatures in Crohn's disease in monozygotic twins 91%
- Epidemiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Cohort of US Black Women 91%
- Assessing Cellular and Transcriptional diversity of IIeal Mucosa amongst Treatment Naïve and Treated Crohn’s disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific type 1 diabetes risk genes underpin age-at-diagnosis and indicate joint defects in immunity, beta-cell fragility and responses to viral infections in early-onset disease. 90%
- Gut microbiome composition is predictive of incident type 2 diabetes 88%
- Accounting for age-related increases in HbA1c more accurately quantifies risk of Type 1 Diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive adults 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Colonic mucosal associated invariant T cells in Crohn’s disease have a diverse and non-public T cell receptor beta chain repertoire 91%
- Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in pregnant women receiving biologics for inflammatory bowel disease 90%
- Prevalence and Factors Associated with Celiac Disease in High-Risk Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.