Back

Food insecurity among adolescent girls who are mothers (10-19 years) in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol

Akinwande, S. F.; Logie, C. H.; Newman, P. A.; Akinwande, K. O.; Massaquoi, N.

2025-05-29 nutrition
10.1101/2025.05.26.25328158 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdolescent girls in resource-constrained settings are vulnerable to sexual exploitation and gender inequities due to poverty, leading to teen motherhood, which is often characterised by stigmatization. Marginalized adolescent mothers may experience stigma in their family, school, community, health, and public services, resulting in poverty, which exacerbates food insecurity. This scoping review will explore the drivers, coping strategies, and the mental, sexual and reproductive health impacts associated with food insecurity among adolescent mothers (ages 10-19 years) in SSA. MethodsWe will apply the scoping review framework outlined by Arksey and OMalley and further developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the reporting guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (S1Table). The overall research question is: What are the drivers, coping strategies, and the mental, sexual and reproductive health impacts associated with food insecurity among adolescent mothers (10-19 years) in SSA? In collaboration with a research librarian, search strategies will be developed using text words and subject headings (eg, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), Emtree) related to adolescent mothers and food insecurity in SSA. We will include quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and review studies in our analysis. A thematic analysis will be conducted on the findings, with results presented in both narrative and tabular formats. Ethics and DisseminationFormal ethical approval is not required as we are not collecting primary data. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at international conferences.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.2%
4
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
7
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
10
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
23
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%