Back

RNA-sequencing Strain-specific Genome Alignment Increases Differential Expression Findings in Comparison of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Nucleus Accumbens

Gnatowski, E.; Zeliff, D.; Dozmorov, M. G.; Miles, M. F.

2025-05-25 genomics
10.1101/2025.05.25.656014 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a polygenic disease defined by the inability to regulate alcohol consumption despite adverse consequences. C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice, the progenitor strains to the BXD recombinant inbred strain, exhibit differences in voluntary ethanol consumption and other ethanol behaviors, making them frequently used models for studying genetic influences on ethanol responses. The B6 genome is the standard reference genome for the majority of mouse RNA-sequencing (RNAseq) studies, including studies on D2 mice. We hypothesized that aligning B6 and D2 RNAseq data to their strain specific genome would allow improved detection of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in comparison of brain gene expression between these two strains. RNA samples obtained from B6 and D2 nucleus accumbens (NAc) tissue were analyzed using a standard RNAseq analysis pipeline except from genome alignment. Following quality control, samples were aligned to either the B6 reference genome (Release 108) or the D2 samples were aligned to a recent homologous genome assembly (GCA_921998315.2). Alignment of D2 samples to the D2 genome showed significantly higher alignment compared to the B6 reference genome (93.82% vs 92.02%, p = 0.0272), but also showed a decrease in the number of total reads assigned (72.30%% vs 74.36%, p <0.0001). When comparing B6 and D2 expression, using the D2 alignment resulted in large increases in the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (10,777 vs 6,191) and differentially utilized exons (DUEs) (81,206 vs 21,223) with resulting changes in gene ontology functional analyses. The gene ontology identified substantial overlap between the two analyses while also adding novel categories. These studies highlight the importance of using strain-specific alignment in increasing the number of reads aligned and the number of DEGs and DUEs identified. The use of strain-specific alignment in RNA-seq studies may provide greater accuracy in investigating gene expression and pathways regulated by ethanol in model organism studies on molecular mechanisms of AUD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
11
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
22
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
24
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%