Back

Multiplexed Targeted Spatial Mass Spectrometry Imaging Assays to monitor lipids and NAD+ metabolites in CD38 knockout mice exhibiting improved metabolism.

Schurman, C. A.; Bons, J.; Kumaar, P. V.; Fang, J.; Hormazabal, G. V.; Roberts, A.; Riley, R. R.; Tao, N.; Verdin, E.; Schilling, B.

2025-05-26 cell biology
10.1101/2025.05.25.655991 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a rapidly advancing technology that provides mapping of the spatial molecular landscape of tissues for a variety of analytes. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MSI is commonly employed, however, confident in situ identification and accurate quantification of analytes remain challenging. We present a novel imaging methodology combining trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS)-based parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF) with MALDI ionization for targeted imaging parallel reaction monitoring (iprm-PASEF). We investigated the spatial distribution of lipids and metabolites in liver tissues from male wild-type and CD38 knockout mice (CD38-/-). CD38, an enzyme involved in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) metabolism, significantly influences liver metabolic function and contributes to age-related NAD decline. Although CD38 deletion previously was linked to improved metabolic phenotypes, the underlying spatial metabolic mechanisms are poorly understood. The spatial iprm-PASEF workflow enabled confident identification and differentiation of lipid isomers at the MS2 fragment ion level and confirmed increased NAD+ and decreased adenosine diphosphate ribose (ADPR), a by-product of NAD+ hydrolysis, in CD38-/- livers. This approach provided confident, specific, and robust MS2-based identification and quantification of fragment ions in spatial MSI experiments. Additionally, the innovative iprm-PASEF opens unprecedented opportunities for spatial metabolomics and lipidomics, offering spatially resolved insights into molecular mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.