Back

Specialised RNA decay fine-tunes monogenic antigen expression in African trypanosomes

Lansink, L. I. M.; Walther, L.; Longmore, S.; Jones, M.; Dowle, A.; Faria, J. R.

2025-05-25 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.05.24.654301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antigenic variation is a sophisticated immune evasion strategy employed by many pathogens. Trypanosoma brucei expresses a single Variant-Surface-Glycoprotein (VSG) from a large genetic repertoire, which they periodically switch throughout an infection. Co-transcribed with the active-VSG within a specialised nuclear body are expression-site-associated-genes (ESAGs), involved in important host-parasite interactions, including protecting the parasite from human serum lytic effects, modulating the hosts innate immune response and uptake of essential nutrients. Despite expression within the same polycistron, there is a significant differential expression between ESAGs and VSGs (>140-fold), however, the regulatory mechanism has remained elusive for decades. Here, using a combination of genetic tools, super resolution microscopy, proteomics and transcriptomics analyses, we identified three novel proteins, which are recruited in a hierarchical manner, forming discreet sub-nuclear condensates that are developmentally regulated and negatively regulate ESAG transcripts. Among them, Expression-Site-Body-specific-protein-2 (ESB2) contains a nuclease domain that shares structural similarity to the endonuclease domain found in SMG6, a critical component of nonsense mediated decay in mammals. Mutation of key residues required for the nuclease activity impaired ESB2 localisation and function. Overall, our findings reveal a novel mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation and shed light on how specialised RNA decay can regulate expression of specific genes.

Published in Nature Microbiology (predicted rank #13) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.