Back

Benchmarking methods integrating GWAS and single-cell transcriptomic data for mapping trait-cell type associations

Zeng, J.; Wray, N. R.; Li, A.; Lin, T.; Walker, A.; Tan, X.; Zhao, R.; Yao, S.; Hjerling-Leffler, J.; Sullivan, P. F.

2025-05-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.05.24.25328275
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered numerous trait-associated variants, but their biological context remains unclear. Integrating GWAS summary statistics with single-cell RNA-sequencing expression profiles can help identify the cell types in which these variants influence traits. Two main strategies have been developed to integrate these data types. The "single cell to GWAS" strategy (representing most methods) identifies gene sets with cell-type-specific expression and then follows with enrichment analyses applied to GWAS summary statistics. Conversely, the "GWAS to single cell" strategy begins with a list of trait-associated genes and calculates a cumulative disease score per cell based on gene expression count data. We systematically evaluated 19 approaches verses "ground truth" trait-cell type pairs to assess their statistical power and false positive rates. Based on these analyses, we draw seven key conclusions to guide future studies. We also propose a Cauchy approach to combine the two main strategies to maximize power for detecting trait-cell type associations.

Matching journals

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 0.5%
38× avg
2
Nature Genetics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 72 published papers
Top 0.7%
28× avg
3
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 6%
4.9× avg
4
Cell Genomics
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 0.1%
53× avg
5
Genome Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 56 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
6
PLOS Genetics
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 39 published papers
Top 0.3%
32× avg
7
Genome Biology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
#1
91× avg
8
Bioinformatics
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.3%
41× avg
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · based on 100 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
10
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 0.5%
28× avg
11
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 62%
2.4%
12
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 15%
1.8× avg
13
Human Molecular Genetics
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 28 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
14
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 4%
5.7× avg
15
Nature
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 58 published papers
Top 6%
4.5× avg
16
Human Genetics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
17
BMC Genomics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.5%
20× avg
18
Science Advances
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 52 published papers
Top 4%
4.5× avg
19
npj Genomic Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
9.8× avg
20
Human Genomics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
17× avg