AI-HOPE-TP53: A Pathway-Centric AI Agent for Analyzing PI3K-Driven Molecular Events in Colorectal Cancer Precision Oncology
Yang, E.-W.; Waldrup, B.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionEarly-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rising rapidly, especially among populations at risk who experience disproportionate incidence and mortality. The TP53 pathway, frequently altered in CRC, regulates key processes such as DNA repair and apoptosis. Despite its clinical relevance, TP53 dysregulation remains understudied in EOCRC, particularly in populations at risk. Current tools lack support for pathway-specific, population-stratified, and treatment-aware analysis. To address this gap, we developed AI-HOPE-TP53--the first conversational AI agent designed to explore TP53 alterations in CRC using harmonized clinical-genomic data and natural language queries. MethodsAI-HOPE-TP53 leverages large language models (LLMs) to translate natural language prompts into executable bioinformatics workflows operating on datasets from cBioPortal. It supports dynamic cohort stratification by TP53-related genes, age, MSI status, treatment, tumor stage, and ethnicity. Automated analyses include mutation frequency, co-mutation profiling, survival curves, and odds ratios. ResultsAI-HOPE-TP53 successfully replicated known molecular characterization, identifying higher TP53 alteration rates in EOCRC patients. It revealed trends toward improved survival in patients with TP53 mutations and identified significant enrichment of H/L individuals among early-onset, FOLFOX-treated cases (OR = 2.002, p < 0.0001). Additional analyses uncovered subsite-specific outcomes in ATM-mutant CRC, stage-specific effects in CHEK1-mutated tumors, and disproportionate health burdens in treatment exposure. ConclusionsAI-HOPE-TP53 enables fast, natural language-driven exploration of TP53 pathway alterations in CRC. Its ability to integrate clinical and genomic data across diverse subgroups makes it a powerful tool for precision oncology and Community-engaged health research--supporting both hypothesis validation and discovery in EOCRC and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Text-mining clinically relevant cancer biomarkers for curation into the CIViC database 94%
- Pan-cancer identification of clinically relevant genomic subtypes using outcome-weighted integrative clustering 94%
- Personalized Cancer Therapy Prioritization Based on Driver Alteration Co-occurrence Patterns 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-Based Consensus Molecular Subtyping in Rectal Cancer Biopsies and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy 94%
- Real-World Benchmarking and Validation of Foundation Model Transformers for Endometrial Cancer Subtyping from Histopathology 94%
- EXaCT-2: An augmented and customizable oncology-focused whole exome sequencing platform 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- LUNAR: A Deep Learning Model to Predict Glioma Recurrence Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data 92%
- Achieving Inclusive Healthcare through Integrating Education and Research with AI and Personalized Curricula 91%
- Multi-resolution deep learning characterizestertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge Connector: Decision support system for multiomics-based precision oncology 95%
- Self-Supervised Learning Reveals Clinically Relevant Histomorphological Patterns for Therapeutic Strategies in Colon Cancer 95%
- Machine learning-based tissue of origin classification for cancer of unknown primary diagnostics using genome-wide mutation features 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- GARD: Genomic Data based Drug Repurposing in Head and Neck Cancer with Large Language Model Validation 94%
- Decoding the JAK-STAT axis in colorectal cancer with AI-HOPE-JAK-STAT: A conversational artificial intelligence approach to clinical-genomic integration 93%
- Precision Oncology Insights into WNT Pathway Alterations in FOLFOX-Treated Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in High-Risk Populations 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.