Adapting models with single time-to-event outcomes to include a competing outcome: an exemplar adjusting risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma for death from other causes.
Stimpson, G.; Usher-Smith, J.; Stewart, G. D.; Pharoah, P.; Harrison, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundRisk prediction models, in particular prognostic models, are used by clinicians to inform care and communicate risks to patients. However, many time-to-event models typically consider only one disease-specific outcome, which leads to overestimation of risk in populations where other-cause mortality is high. An example of this is the widely used Leibovich model, which models distant metastatic recurrence risk in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC, the most common form of kidney cancer) who have been treated surgically with radical nephrectomy. MethodsIn this study, we describe a novel approach for adapting existing risk prediction models retrospectively to include adjustment for a competing outcome, using population level data. We apply this approach to the Leibovich model, using life tables from the OZice of National Statistics, to generate the Leibovich Plus model and then illustrate the impact of increasing age on estimated risk of recurrence using both models. ResultsComparing the predicted risk from the Leibovich model with the predicted risk of distant metastatic recurrence using the Leibovich Plus model, we show how distant-metastatic recurrence risk is overestimated when competing risks are not considered, particularly in older patients with high-risk tumours when using only a disease-specific outcome. For example, the risk of distant metastatic recurrence in individuals with a high-risk tumour pathology is 84.6% in a 55 year old individual after 10 years, but drops to 52.1% in an 85 year old individual with the same tumour pathology after 10 years. ConclusionsThis work describes an approach for adapting existing time-to-event models with disease-specific outcomes to include a competing outcome without the need for new data and illustrates the impact incorporation of competing risks has on estimated risk, particularly in older populations with high overall mortality risk. Such models, for example, the Leibovich Plus model for RCC, can be used in clinical consultations to provide a risk of recurrence adjusted for the risk of death from other causes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a SEER-based retrospective cohort study 92%
- Latent class regression improves the predictive acuity and clinical utility of survival prognostication amongst chronic heart failure patients. 92%
- A model framework for projecting the prevalence and impact of Long-COVID in the UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 91%
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 90%
- A mechanistic model of malignant transformation in vestibular schwannoma 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Syngeneic model of carcinogen-induced tumor mimics basal/squamous, stromal-rich, and neuroendocrine molecular and immunological features of muscle-invasive bladder cancer 88%
- Examination of the role of mutualism in immune evasion 88%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deprivation and Segregation in Ovarian cancer survival among African American Women: a mediated analysis 90%
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 86%
- Increasing concentration of COVID-19 by socioeconomic determinants and geography in Toronto, Canada: an observational study 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.