Back

Ultrasonography in General Practice: insights from an implementation study in a Low-income neighborhood of Amsterdam

Harskamp, R. E.; Soddemann genaamd Keute, B.; Pleiter, C.; Himmelreich, J. C. L.

2025-05-23 primary care research
10.1101/2025.05.22.25327578 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUltrasonography is increasingly being used in primary care settings, facilitated by technological advancements, reduced device-related costs, and improved access to training and support. It holds particular promise for underserved communities, where barriers such as co-pays or long waiting lists can limit access to diagnostic services. This study evaluates the impact of a primary care ultrasonography service in an underserved urban community. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent ultrasonography between 2019-2024 at a large primary care center (n=7877 patients) in Amsterdam the Netherlands. The primary outcomes included the frequency, indications, and diagnostic outcomes. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, changes in clinical decision-making, referral rates, and costs. ResultsA total of 394 patients were included, of whom 62.4% underwent abdominal ultrasonography, 31.7% gynecological ultrasonography, and 5.8% other types of ultrasounds. Ultrasonography yielded conclusive results in 83.5% of cases, and reduced secondary care referrals by 58.8%. The sensitivity and specificity for ultrasonographic abnormalities were 98.9% (95%CI: 94.2-99.9%) and 89.8% (95%CI: 85.3-93.4%), respectively. ConclusionPrimary care ultrasonography enhances diagnostic efficiency and reduces unnecessary referrals in more than half of cases. Its use in underserved communities can improve healthcare access and help address system-related health disparities. Further research is needed to assess its cost-effectiveness and scalability.

Published in Sonography · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.