Back

Impact of Group Size and Habitat Disturbance on Parasitic Infection in Free-ranging Proboscis Monkeys

Fitri-Suhaimi, M. N.; Frias, L.; Zimmermann, E.; Lambut, P.; Tangah, J.; Bernard, H.; Subbiah, V. K.; Matsuda, I.

2025-05-26 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.21.655443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Group-living primates experience the benefits and costs associated with sociality, including an elevated risk of parasite transmission. However, the relative influence of group type (i.e., social structure), group size, and habitat disturbance on parasitic infection remains unclear, particularly in Southeast Asian primates. In this study, the abundance of intestinal parasites in proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) inhabiting a riverine forest along the Menanggul River, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, was investigated. Fecal samples (n = 160) were collected from one-male-multifemale and all-male groups in areas with varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance, with efforts made to ensure that each sample originated from a different individual. In addition, the effects of group type, group size, and sampling location on parasite abundance were evaluated using fecal egg counts and Bayesian models. Three dominant parasite species groups (Trichuris sp., Strongyloides fuelleborni, and Oesophagostomum aculeatum) with an overall infection prevalence of 81.25% were identified. Results showed that group type did not significantly affect parasite abundance. However, group size showed a positive correlation with the abundance of Trichuris sp. and a negative correlation with S. fuelleborni and O. aculeatum. In addition, our models revealed that the infection load of Trichuris sp. decreased with increasing distance from the river mouth, which was used as a proxy for a disturbance gradient, whereas O. aculeatum exhibited higher infection load at greater distances, indicating lower prevalence in more disturbed downstream areas. Thus, parasite abundance in proboscis monkeys may be shaped by social and environmental factors, with taxa-specific responses likely reflecting differences in environmental persistence and transmission ecology.

Published in International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Parasitology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
5
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
15
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
23
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Primates
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%