Back

Prelimbic cortical excitatory overdrive and inhibitory underdrive accompany environmental suppression of food seeking

Peters, K. Z.; Pedan, Z.; Agbude, R.; Woods, E. C.; Steele, O. G.; Suto, N.; Kinghorn, S. B.; Tsaponina, O.; Koya, E.

2025-05-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.21.655312 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cues associated with food, such as fast-food advertising, can provoke food cravings and may lead to unhealthy overeating. Environmental enrichment (EE) that enhances cognitive and physical stimulation can reduce cue-evoked sucrose seeking in mice and recruitment of sucrose cue-reactive neurons or neuronal ensembles in the prelimbic cortex (PL), which regulates appetitive behaviors. Hence, EE provides us with a behavioral model and neuronal targets to identify anti-craving relevant mechanisms. Here, we investigated in the PL how EE modulated neuronal excitability and activity patterns in cue-reactive neuronal populations. Chemogenetic inhibition of cue-reactive neurons in PL blocked cue-evoked sucrose seeking, thereby confirming the function of these neurons in sucrose cue memory. EE boosted the baseline excitability of originally, or before EE exposure, cue-reactive, excitatory pyramidal cells in PL. Furthermore, their sucrose cue-specificity was lost - resulting in their persistent activation and non-cue selective activation or excitatory overdrive. Furthermore, EE reduced recruitment of cue-reactive, inhibitory interneurons reflecting inhibitory underdrive. Taken together, impaired neuronal food cue processing due to simultaneous prefrontal cortical excitatory overdrive and inhibitory underdrive likely underlies EEs anti-craving action, thereby serving as potential neurophysiological targets to develop novel medications that help control food cravings.

Published in Neuropsychopharmacology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.