Back

Differential conformational expansion of Nup98-HOXA9 oncoprotein in micro- and macrophases

Lemke, E. A.; Girard, M.; Ruan, H.; Dillenburg, R.; Wittmann, S.

2025-05-23 biophysics
10.1101/2025.05.21.655138 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) play a central role in gene regulation by binding to specific DNA sequences and orchestrating the transcriptional machinery. A majority of eukaryotic TFs have a block copolymer architecture, with at least one block being a folded DNA interaction domain, and another block being highly enriched in intrinsic disorder. Multivalent interactions in the intrinsically disordered region (IDR) can contribute to phase separation into macroscopic condensates. In this study, we focus on Nup98-HOXA9 (NHA9), a chimeric transcription factor implicated in leukemogenesis, in which two FG-repeat-rich IDRs derived from Nup98 get fused to the C-terminal part of transcription factor HOXA9. By integrating experiments and simulations, we examined the structural dynamics of NHA9s FG domain across assembly states. We found that the FG domain has different conformational compactness in the monomeric state, oligomeric, and densely packed condensate state. Notably, the oligomeric state exhibits micelle-like organisation, with the DNA-binding domain exposed at the periphery. While their architecture is non-random, their sizes depend on NHA9 concentration, consistent with non-core-shell spherical micelles. Molecular dynamics simulations support the expansion behaviour of NHA9s FG domain as oligomeric assemblies grow in size and reveal micelle-like structural features in oligomeric assemblies. These findings offer molecular insight into the phase behaviour of NHA9 and highlight the dynamic conformational transitions of IDRs during condensate formation, with implications for understanding transcriptional regulation in cancer.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.