Back

Chinmo defines the region-specific oncogenic competence in the Drosophila central nervous system

Nguyen, P.-K.; Froldi, F.; Cheng, L.

2025-05-21 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.05.20.655209 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While genetic mutations can promote hyperplastic growth, they do not always result in oncogenic outcomes. We and others have previously identified the transcription factors Nerfin-1 and Lola as inhibitors of dedifferentiation. Here, we investigate how the oncogenic potential of dedifferentiation varies across different neural lineages in the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). We found that Nerfin-1 inactivation causes tumorigenic phenotypes in the central brain (CB) and the ventral nerve cord (VNC) but not the optic lobes (OLs). In contrast, Lola inactivation leads to tumour overgrowth specifically in the OLs. We identify Chinmo, a temporal transcription factor, and its regulation by ecdysone signalling as key determinants of the oncogenic competence in different regions of the brain, influencing the tumorigenic outcome of dedifferentiation. This work provides a fundamental framework to understand how oncogenic competence arises beyond genetic mutations. Significance statementIn the CNS, the same tumorigenic mutation has been shown cause differential oncogenic outcomes in different regions of the brain. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains largely unknown. We have previously demonstrated that malignant brain tumours can be induced via neuronal dedifferentiation in the Drosophila CNS. Here, we demonstrate that dedifferentiated neural stem cells drive tumorigenesis in a region-specific manner, accounted for by region-specific expression and regulation of temporal factors by cell-intrinsic and hormonal signals. Together, this work extends our understandings of how brain regionalisation can be a constraint to oncogenesis.

Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.