Error-driven changes in hippocampal representations accompany flexible re-learning
Rich, P. D.; Thiberge, S. Y.; Daw, N. D.; Tank, D. W.
Show abstract
Flexible behavior requires both the learning of new associations, and the suppression of previous ones, but how neural circuits achieve this balance remains unclear. Here we show that continuous changes in hippocampal representations, known as drift, may facilitate this process. We used voluntary head-fixation and calcium imaging to record from CA1 in rats during an odor-guided navigation task that required frequent re-learning. We found systematic representational changes over the course of the multi-hour sessions that were increased following errors. A simple neural network model revealed that such error-driven drift can enable flexible re-learning by allowing new associations to form from new neural patterns. A consequence of this is that previous associations are maintained in latent synaptic weights. These findings reconcile the apparent tension between representational drift and stable memory storage, demonstrating how dynamic neural codes could support both flexible behavior and lasting memories.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Signatures of rapid synaptic learning in the hippocampus during novel experiences 98%
- Grid-cell modules remain coordinated when neural activity is dissociated from external sensory cues 97%
- Rapid synaptic plasticity contributes to a learned conjunctive code of position and choice-related information in the hippocampus 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- New information triggers prospective codes to adapt for flexible navigation 97%
- Cortical Reactivation of Non-Spatial and Spatial Memory Representations Coordinate with Hippocampus to Form a Memory Dialogue 97%
- Place cell map genesis via competitive learning and conjunctive coding in the dentate gyrus 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.