Back

Clonal Hematopoiesis Mutations Increase Risk of Alzheimer's Disease with APOE ϵ3/ϵ3 Genotype

Choi, J.; Park, K. S.; Le Guen, Y.; Park, J.-H.; Zhou, Z.; Enyenihi, L.; Rosen, I.; Choi, Y.-H.; Walsh, C. A.; Kim, J.-W.; Huang, A. Y.; Lee, E. A.

2025-05-21 genetics
10.1101/2025.05.19.654981 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) represents clonal expansion of blood cells, and increases the risk of hematological malignancies and cardiovascular disorders. Recent studies have studied CHIP mutations in individuals with Alzheimers disease (AD), but it is unclear whether their role in AD pathogenesis is protective, detrimental, or neutral. In this study, we used molecular-barcoded deep gene panel sequencing ([~]400X) to examine CHIP mutations in 298 blood samples from AD and neurotypical individuals 60 years and older. The AD patients exhibited a significantly higher burden of CHIP mutations compared to the age-matched controls (p < 2e-7, odds ratio (OR) = 2.89), particularly in low-frequency variants often not captured by standard whole exome or whole genome sequencing (WGS). This increase was driven by individuals with the APOE {varepsilon}3/{varepsilon}3 genotype and absent in {varepsilon}4 carriers. Analysis of an independent dataset from the Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), comprised of WGS data from [~]30,000 individuals, confirmed increased CHIP mutations in AD versus control (p < 0.02, OR = 1.32), again driven by individuals with APOE {varepsilon}3/{varepsilon}3 genotype. CHIP mutations in AD patients also showed stronger positive selection than in controls. Our results indicate that AD patients show significantly more CHIP mutations in their blood than controls, involving more than one third of AD patients, and contributing to AD risk through a mechanism independent of APOE {varepsilon}4.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.