A Conserved Architecture of Allosteric Communications and Regulatory Hotspots in the KRAS Complexes with Diverse Binding Proteins Controls Mechanisms of Effector Mimicry and Allosteric Modulation : Atomistic Revelations from Molecular Simulations and Mutational Scanning of Binding Energetics and Allostery
Alshahrani, M.; Parikh, V.; Foley, B.; Verkhivker, G.
Show abstract
KRAS is a pivotal oncoprotein that regulates cell proliferation and survival through interactions with downstream effectors such as RAF1. Despite significant advances in understanding KRAS biology, the structural and dynamic mechanisms of KRAS allostery remain unresolved. In this study, we employ microsecond molecular dynamics simulations, mutational scanning and binding free energy calculations together with dynamic network modeling to dissect how engineered DARPin proteins K27, K55, K13, and K1 engage KRAS through diverse molecular mechanisms ranging from effector mimicry to conformational restriction and allosteric modulation. Mutational scanning across all four DARPin systems identifies a core set of evolutionarily constrained residues that function as universal hotspots in KRAS recognition. KRAS residues I36, Y40, M67, and H95 consistently emerge as critical contributors to binding stability. Binding free energy computations show that despite similar binding modes K27 relies heavily on electrostatic contributions from major binding hotspots while K55 exploits a dense hydrophobic cluster enhancing its effector-mimetic signature. Allosteric binders K13 and K19, by contrast, stabilize a KRAS-specific pocket introducing new hinges and bottlenecks that rewire the communication architecture of KRAS without full immobilization. Network-based analysis reveals a strikingly consistent theme: despite their distinct mechanisms of recognition, all systems engage a unifying allosteric architecture that spans multiple functional motifs. This architecture is not only preserved across complexes but also mirrors the intrinsic communication framework of KRAS itself, where specific residues function as central hubs transmitting conformational changes across the protein. By integrating dynamic profiling, energetic mapping, and network-modeling our study provides a multi-scale mechanistic roadmap for targeting KRAS, revealing how engineered proteins can exploit both conserved motifs and isoform-specific features to enable precision modulation of KRAS signaling in oncogenic contexts.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Markov State Models and Perturbation-Based Approaches Reveal Distinct Dynamic Signatures and Hidden Allosteric Pockets in the Emerging SARS-Cov-2 Spike Omicron Variants Complexes with the Host Receptor: The Interplay of Dynamics and Convergent Evolution Modulates Allostery and Functional Mechanisms 96%
- Deep Mutational Scanning of Dynamic Interaction Networks in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes: Allosteric Hotspots Control Functional Mimicry and Resilience to Mutational Escape 96%
- Structural and Dynamic Effects of PTEN C-terminal Tail Phosphorylation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ERK Allosteric Activation: The Importance of Two Ordered Phosphorylation Events 96%
- Conformational flexibility Of A Highly Conserved Helix Controls Cryptic Pocket Formation In FtsZ 95%
- Structure-Based Classification of CRISPR/Cas9 Proteins: A Machine Learning Approach to Elucidating Cas9 Allostery 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.