Neuronal oscillations predict un-cued task switching in the Wisconsin card sorting test
Sattelberger, J.; Haque, H.; Liu, M.; Simola, J.; Palva, J. M.; Halassa, M.; Palva, S.
Show abstract
Cognitive flexibility is the ability to keep or update contextual cognitive representations. The underlying neural mechanisms and how it is influenced by individual sensitivity to feedback are not known. We measured cognitive flexibility under uncertainty with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task and brain activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG). Using a behavioral sequential learning model, we show that variability in cognitive flexibility is predicted by individual reward and punishment sensitivity to feedback and anticipation and exploration tendencies. Uncovering their brain oscillatory signatures showed that individual learning speed is predicted by suppressed alpha-beta (7-32 Hz) and increased broad-band gamma (52-96 Hz) amplitudes along with concurrent large-scale alpha (7-13 Hz) desynchronization. Importantly, these oscillatory sub-processes were explained by individual levels of distinct feedback sensitivities. These results provide a novel account on neural sub-computations underlying flexible contextual switching between stable and unstable cognitive representations that predict the individual speed of rule learning.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MEG frequency tagging reveals a grid-like code during covert attentional movements 95%
- Situating the parietal memory network in the context of multiple parallel distributed networks using high-resolution functional connectivity 95%
- Perceptual stability reflected in neuronal pattern similarities in human visual cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.