Back

Concurrent validity and between-device reliability of the Catapult Vector S8 GNSS device

Ellens, S.; Moran, C.; Varley, M. C.

2025-05-21 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.05.19.25327964 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study assessed the concurrent validity and between-device reliability of the Catapult Vector S8 GNSS device for measuring distance, speed, acceleration and banded distance metrics. Twelve male sub-elite team sport athletes completed a testing protocol consisting of linear sprints, change of direction drills and a modified small-sided game. Validity was evaluated against criterion reference systems, a VICON motion capture system for most trials and a Stalker ATS radar for 50 m sprints, evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias. Between-device reliability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and typical error (TE%). The Vector S8 demonstrated good validity with minimal errors for instantaneous distance (RMSE: 0.03 {+/-} 0.01 m), speed (RMSE: 0.14 {+/-} 0.05 ms-1) and acceleration (RMSE: 0.29 {+/-} 0.14 ms-2). No overall bias was detected for instantaneous distance and speed, and the bias for acceleration (-0.016) was minimal. Accumulated distance showed a small underestimation across trials (mean bias -1.42%), with consistently low RMSE values (0.26-3.06 m), indicating high measurement precision. The 50 m sprint results showed similar validity, with minimal RMSE for instantaneous speed (0.14 {+/-} 0.15 ms-1) and acceleration (0.22 {+/-} 0.22 ms-2). Between device reliability demonstrated excellent agreement across all measured variables (ICC [&ge;] 0.90) with good precision (TE as CV <5%). No significant systematic bias was observed between devices for any variable (p > 0.05). This is the first study to validate the Catapult Vector S8 GNSS device, demonstrating that it is valid and reliable for measuring distance, speed and acceleration during sport-specific movements.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.8%
3
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
7
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
8
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
15
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
18
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%