Modelling the potential contributions of polygenic risk stratification to cost-effective screening for prostate cancer
Dixon, P.; Aning, J.; Martin, R.; Clements, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers globally. The potential for polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to improve risk stratification for early detection of PCA in screening interventions is of considerable interest. We evaluated the cost- effectiveness of PRS-guided screening strategies. MethodsThe Prostata microsimulation model, calibrated to UK-specific epidemiological and clinical data, simulated individual life histories, including disease onset and progression, tumour characteristics by Gleason score, and metastatic status. The model incorporated both measured and unmeasured components of polygenic risk for incident PCa, and included ancestry-specific strata. Screening strategies were compared against a no-screening baseline. We modelled one-off, age-based prostate specific antigen screening at 50, 60, or 70 years, as well as repeated uniform screening every 4 or 2 years from age 50 to 69 with and without PRS stratification. ResultsQuality-adjusted life years were similar across all screening strategies, while differences in costs were more pronounced. A "no screening" strategy had the lowest lifetime cost of all strategies and (very marginally) the shortest life expectancy. Realistic PRS implementations were dominated (less effective and more expensive) in all scenarios, and may not provide greater cost-effectiveness than a single PSA screen at age 50 or compared to no screening at all. ConclusionOur study found little evidence that PRSs would be cost-effective in pragmatic PCa screening settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 91%
- Applying a genetic risk score for prostate cancer to men with lower urinary tract symptoms in primary care to predict prostate cancer diagnosis: a cohort study in the UK Biobank 91%
- The impact of COVID-19 disruption to cervical cancer screening in England on excess diagnoses 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- African-specific improvement of a polygenic hazard score for age at diagnosis of prostate cancer 90%
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 89%
- Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I, total and free testosterone concentrations and prostate cancer risk in 200,000 men in UK Biobank 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 89%
- Influence of follow-up, screening age, interval, and compliance on overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a modelling study 89%
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between Lipoprotein A and other lipids with prostate cancer risk: A multivariable Mendelian randomisation study 89%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 86%
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is mammography screening beneficial: An individual-based stochastic model for breast cancer incidence and mortality 89%
- Modelling Disease Mitigation at Mass Gatherings: A Case Study of COVID-19 at the 2022 FIFA World Cup 88%
- Every which way? On predicting tumor evolution using cancer progression models 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.