Back

AENEAS Project: Machine Vision-Based Real-Time Anatomy Detection. Application to the Pterional Trans-Sylvian Approach

Olei, S.; Sarwin, G.; Staartjes, V. E.; Zanuttini, L.; Ryu, S.-J.; Regli, L.; Konukoglu, E.; Serra, C.

2025-05-22 surgery
10.1101/2025.05.19.25327893 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSurgical success hinges on two core factors: technical execution and cognitive planning. While the former can be trained and potentially augmented through robotics, the latter -- developing an accurate "mental roadmap" of a certain operation -- remains complex, deeply individualized and resistant to standardization. In neurosurgery, where minute anatomical distinctions can dictate outcomes, enhancing intraoperative guidance could reduce variability among surgeons and improve global standards. Recent developments in machine vision offer a promising avenue. Previous studies demonstrated that deep learning models could successfully identify anatomical landmarks in highly standardized procedures such as trans-sphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, the applicability of such techniques in more variable and multidimensional intracranial procedures remains unproven. This study investigates whether a deep learning model can recognize key anatomical structures during the more complex pterional trans-sylvian (PTS) approach. Materials and MethodsWe developed a deep learning object detection model (YOLOv7x) trained on 5.307 labeled frames from 78 surgical videos of 76 patients undergoing PTS. Surgical steps were standardized, and key anatomical targets--frontal/temporal dura, inferior frontal/superior temporal gyri, optic and olfactory nerves and internal carotid artery (ICA) -- were annotated by specifically trained neurosurgical residents and verified by the operating surgeon. Bounding boxes derived from segmentation masks served as training inputs. Performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. ResultsThe model achieved promising detection performance for deep structures, particularly the optic nerve (AP50: 0.73) and ICA (AP50: 0.67). Superficial structures, like the dura and the cortical gyri, had lower precision (AP50 range: 0.25-0.45), likely due to morphological similarity and optical variability. Performance variability across classes reflects the complexity of the anatomical setting along with data limitations. ConclusionThis study shows the feasibility of applying machine vision techniques for anatomical detection in a complex and variable neurosurgical setting. While challenges remain in detecting less distinctive structures, the high accuracy achieved for deep anatomical landmarks validates this approach. These findings mark an essential step towards a machine vision surgical guidance system. Future applications could include real-time anatomical recognition, integration with neuronavigation and the development of AI-supported "surgical roadmaps" to improve intraoperative orientation and global neurosurgical practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
13
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%