Back

Tension between timeliness and completeness of data in the initiation of cancer treatment: A qualitative study of oncology practice workflows and enduring health IT challenges

Samal, L.; Kyle, M. A.; Kilgallon, J. L.; Landrum, K. M.; Gawande, A. A.; Jacobson, J. O.; Hassett, M. J.

2025-05-21 health informatics
10.1101/2025.05.19.25324967 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDiagnostic evaluation and treatment planning for newly diagnosed cancer requires a coordinated effort across multiple specialties. Delays in treatment initiation are common, leading to unnecessary anxiety and decreased survival. Given that timely treatment initiation is pivotal to providing high quality cancer care, we sought to characterize patient intake, workflows, and the role of health information technology (HIT) in a varied group of oncology practices nationwide. MethodsInterviews with oncologists were performed between March and September 2016, with follow-ups conducted between October and December 2021. Thematic analysis was used to assign codes to key elements of the transcripts, group these codes into conceptually distinct and clinically meaningful categories, and identify major cross-cutting themes. ResultsNine oncologists participated in an initial interview (one surgical, two radiation, six medical oncology). Four oncologists participated in a follow-up interview (one radiation, three medical oncology). In both time periods there was tremendous variation in staff roles and communication processes; some oncology practices obtained diagnostic studies before the first oncology consult visit, whereas others waited until after the initial consult visit to begin the diagnostic evaluation. Variability and tension were noted to arise from deficiencies in HIT, such as lack of interoperability, impaired speed and quality of data collection, cumbersome user interfaces, and variety of data types in oncology care. Oncologists reported only modest improvements in HIT between 2016 and 2021. ConclusionAssembling data to make a new cancer diagnosis and treatment plan is complex and time-intensive. HIT interoperability remains a quasi-manual process, contributing to preventable treatment delays. Federal policy supporting interoperability provides an opportunity to develop HIT that supports care coordination and patient-centered care, but effective implementation of such tools will be challenging within current workflows.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
12
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%