Tension between timeliness and completeness of data in the initiation of cancer treatment: A qualitative study of oncology practice workflows and enduring health IT challenges
Samal, L.; Kyle, M. A.; Kilgallon, J. L.; Landrum, K. M.; Gawande, A. A.; Jacobson, J. O.; Hassett, M. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionDiagnostic evaluation and treatment planning for newly diagnosed cancer requires a coordinated effort across multiple specialties. Delays in treatment initiation are common, leading to unnecessary anxiety and decreased survival. Given that timely treatment initiation is pivotal to providing high quality cancer care, we sought to characterize patient intake, workflows, and the role of health information technology (HIT) in a varied group of oncology practices nationwide. MethodsInterviews with oncologists were performed between March and September 2016, with follow-ups conducted between October and December 2021. Thematic analysis was used to assign codes to key elements of the transcripts, group these codes into conceptually distinct and clinically meaningful categories, and identify major cross-cutting themes. ResultsNine oncologists participated in an initial interview (one surgical, two radiation, six medical oncology). Four oncologists participated in a follow-up interview (one radiation, three medical oncology). In both time periods there was tremendous variation in staff roles and communication processes; some oncology practices obtained diagnostic studies before the first oncology consult visit, whereas others waited until after the initial consult visit to begin the diagnostic evaluation. Variability and tension were noted to arise from deficiencies in HIT, such as lack of interoperability, impaired speed and quality of data collection, cumbersome user interfaces, and variety of data types in oncology care. Oncologists reported only modest improvements in HIT between 2016 and 2021. ConclusionAssembling data to make a new cancer diagnosis and treatment plan is complex and time-intensive. HIT interoperability remains a quasi-manual process, contributing to preventable treatment delays. Federal policy supporting interoperability provides an opportunity to develop HIT that supports care coordination and patient-centered care, but effective implementation of such tools will be challenging within current workflows.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 93%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models to help appeal denied radiotherapy services 93%
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 92%
- Use of natural language understanding to facilitate surgical de-escalation of axillary staging in patients with breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 95%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 92%
- Making prognostic algorithms useful in shared decision-making: Patients and clinicians’ requirements for the Predict:Breast Cancer interface 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes 92%
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 92%
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.