Spatial Sorting of Soft and Stiff Bacteria in the Human Colon
Tozzi, A.
Show abstract
The spatial organization of intestinal microbiota is shaped by biochemical signals, host factors and physical forces. While chemical gradients and host immunity are well studied, the influence of mechanical properties is underexplored. Drawing on soft matter physics and microbiome research, we combined atomic force microscopy data with gut-like flow simulations to investigate whether bacterial stiffness influences spatial organization and mechanical/hydrodynamic responses. Indeed, colonic bacteria differ markedly in stiffness: soft species like Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli and Akkermansia muciniphila display thin peptidoglycan layers and flexible outer membranes, while stiff species like Clostridium difficile, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Enterococcus faecalis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii display greater rigidity linked to thick Gram-positive cell walls. Our simulations showed that mechanical compliance can drive spatial partitioning under laminar shear, with soft bacteria localizing near the mucosal surfaces and stiff bacteria aligning along central flow paths. Further, soft bacteria aligned more quickly with shear flow, migrated more efficiently toward the lumen center, dissipated more energy during collisions and detached more readily from mucosal surfaces. Soft bacteria also formed slower, more diffuse biofilms and exhibited greater displacement under peristaltic compression. This suggests that stiffness, independent of chemical signalling, may shape microbial localization, interaction, organization and persistence in gut-like environments. Stiffness may serve as non-chemical, precision tool for microbiome modulation, paving the way for targeted, mechanically informed interventions. This approach could enable applications like stiffness-guided drug delivery to specific gut regions, selective removal of stiff pathogenic bacteria using mechanical cues and mechanical pre-sorting of microbial populations for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational exploration of treadmilling and protrusion growth observed in fire ant rafts 93%
- Is it selfish to be filamentous in biofilms? Individual-based modeling links microbial growth strategies with morphology using the new and modular iDynoMiCS 2.0 93%
- An Agent-Based Model of Metabolic Signaling Oscillations in Bacillus subtilis Biofilms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling bacterial twitching in fluid flows: a CFD-DEM approach 93%
- Probing Patterning in Microbial Consortia with picCASO: a Cellular Automaton for Spatial Organisation 92%
- Mycobacterium abscessus biofilms have viscoelastic properties which may contribute to their recalcitrance in chronic pulmonary infections. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetotactic Bacteria Optimally Navigate Natural Pore Networks 94%
- Diffusive lensing as a mechanism of intracellular transport and compartmentalization 93%
- Escape problem of magnetotactic bacteria - physiological magnetic field strengths help magnetotactic bacteria navigate in simulated sediments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.