Back

Postural test to differentiate primary aldosteronism from low-renin hypertension

Tizianel, I.; Pagin, E.; Ragazzi, E.; Madinelli, A.; Censi, S.; Sabbadin, C.; Mantero, F.; Mian, C.; Barbot, M.; Antonelli, G.; Ceccato, F.

2025-05-22 physiology
10.1101/2025.05.16.654625 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe diagnostic accuracy of screening and confirmatory tests to differentiate primary aldosteronism (PA) among patients with low-renin hypertension (HTN) is suboptimal. We aimed to assess the role of postural stimulation test (PST, previously used for PA subtyping) in differentiating PA from low-renin HTN. Patients and methodsClinical and endocrine data in clinostatic position (CP) and orthostatic position (OP) during PST were evaluated in 190 hypertensive patients: 80 PA and 110 low-renin HTN. Multivariate techniques were computed: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and k-means clustering. ResultsPST response differentiated our cohort: 96% of PA were detected in the 56/190 patients with always suppressed renin levels, 80% of patients with low-renin HTN were identified among 56/190 subjects with de-suppression of renin from CP to OP and 78/190 with always measurable renin. Increased potassium and measurable renin in OP were predictors of low-renin HTN. Cluster analysis distinguished PA from low-renin HTN: Cluster 2 included 104/110 low-renin HTN; Cluster 1 PA patients showed a higher frequency of suppressed renin levels at baseline and during PST (100% in CP and 95% in OP, respectively). Cluster 1 low-renin HTN patients had lower potassium and a higher frequency of suppressed renin levels at diagnosis and during PST, compared to Cluster 2. PLS-DA and PCA confirmed that renin in OP, renin response to PST and presence of hypokalemia were the most relevant parameters for distinguishing PA from low-renin HTN. ConclusionRenin response during PST can be used to differentiate PA from low-renin HTN.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.