Back

EWSR1::ETS-low cells promote metabolic reprogramming of the tryptophan-kynurenine-AHR axis, immunosuppression, and poor outcome in Ewing sarcoma

Carreno-Gonzalez, M. J.; Hanssen, K. M.; Sadik, A.; Henneberg, A.; Ehlers, A. C.; Ceranski, A. K.; Kołodynska, Z. A.; Zimmermann, M.; Imle, R.; Geyer, F. H.; Ritter, A.; Banito, A.; Knott, M. M. L.; Ohmura, S.; Cidre-Aranaz, F.; Opitz, C. A.; Grünewald, T. G. P.

2025-05-21 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.05.16.654502 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The extent to which dynamic changes in oncogene activity shape cancer cell metabolism and drive disease progression remains poorly understood. Ewing sarcoma (EwS), driven by EWSR1::ETS fusion transcription factors, constitutes an ideal model to interrogate this question, as fluctuations in fusion activity direct divergent transcriptional programs. While EWSR1::ETS-high cells display a rather sessile but proliferative phenotype, EWSR1::ETS-low cells are more invasive. Yet, the mechanisms underlying these different phenotypes remain poorly characterized. Here, by employing an integrative functional metabolomics approach, we link reduced EWSR1::ETS activity in primary EwS tumors to adverse clinical outcome and pronounced activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway. Low EWSR1::ETS states foster tryptophan catabolism and accumulation of the AHR agonist kynurenine, which in turn promotes an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment characterized by impaired natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity and enrichment of immunoregulatory infiltrates. Functionally, AHR silencing restores NK cell-mediated tumor recognition, while also directly suppressing EwS cell proliferation, clonogenicity, and spheroid growth in plasma-like media. Genetic inhibition of AHR reduces tumor burden and metastatic competence in xenograft models. These findings reveal a mechanistic link between oncogene fluctuation, amino acid metabolism, and immune evasion, positioning AHR as a central mediator of EwS progression and a tractable therapeutic vulnerability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.