Back

EEG entropy reflects both intrinsic and stimulation-induced corticospinal excitability

Ruch, S.; Frohlich, J.; Keute, M.; Tang, G.; Keksel, N.; Gharabaghi, A.

2025-05-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.16.654439 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCortical excitability fluctuates throughout the day on multiple timescales, ranging from milliseconds to hours. This is reflected in the large variability of the brains response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, robust and interpretable biomarkers of the brains current excitability state are lacking. ObjectiveWe investigated whether entropy derived from singular value decomposition of short electroencephalography (EEG) segments could serve as a biomarker of cortical excitability as probed by TMS. MethodsEntropy was computed from 1-second EEG segments preceding single-pulse TMS applied over the motor cortex. We assessed whether spontaneous fluctuations in pre-pulse entropy predicted trial-by-trial variability in TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). Additionally, we evaluated whether entropy tracked stimulation-induced changes in cortical excitability. ResultsHigher pre-pulse entropy, particularly over frontal regions, was associated with larger MEP amplitudes. TMS locally increased entropy over the motor cortex, while entropy decreased in other regions during the intervention. Participants who showed greater local increases in entropy from pre-to post-intervention also demonstrated larger increases in corticospinal excitability. ConclusionEntropy derived from short EEG segments reflects both intrinsic and stimulation-induced changes in cortical excitability. This marker may help optimize TMS interventions by informing brain state-dependent stimulation strategies and providing an index of intervention efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.