Back

The interplay between stiffness and hyperglycemia on diabetic foot ulcer wound closure

Albeltagy, N.; Patten, J.; Wang, K.

2025-05-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.05.16.654387 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDiabetic foot ulcers are open wounds with impaired wound closure at the bottom of the foot. Although diabetic plantar skin is stiffer, which should enhance fibroblast mechanotransduction, fibroblasts still fail to migrate effectively. This suggests impaired wound closure is driven by another factor; hyperglycemia ([≥]11.1 mM glucose), which alters fibroblast mechanotransduction. PurposeTo mimic diabetic foot ulcers by developing a 2D circular in vitro wound closure model system to investigate fibroblast mechanoresponse under diabetic plantar skin stiffness and hyperglycemia. MethodsPolydimethylsiloxane was used as substrate, fabricated at 57 kPa and 90 kPa for normal and diabetic plantar skin stiffnesses, respectively. Cell culture media contained a 5.5 mM glucose concentration simulating normal blood glucose or an altered 11.1 mM glucose concentration simulating hyperglycemia. ResultsTime-lapse fluorescent imaging of wound assays reveals a restrictive effect of higher stiffness on migrating fibroblasts under normal glucose conditions, and a biphasic response to hyperglycemic conditions. Fibroblasts migrating on softer substrates mimicking normal plantar skin stiffness and under hyperglycemia have decreased velocity as predicted. Whereas cells migrating on stiffer substrates mimicking diabetic plantar skin stiffness and under hyperglycemia demonstrate increased cell velocity, overcoming the higher stiffnesss restrictive effect. Despite faster cell velocities on higher stiffness, wounds under normal glucose conditions still close faster than those under hyperglycemic conditions. ConclusionThis research establishes a wound closure model demonstrating significantly slower wound closure in diabetic plantar skin with higher stiffness and hyperglycemic glucose levels compared to normal plantar skin with softer stiffness and normal glucose levels.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.6%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
5
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
10
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%