Back

On real-time calibrated prediction for complex model-based decision support in pandemics: Part 2

McKinley, T. J.; Williamson, D. B.; Xiong, X.; Salter, J. M.; Challen, R.; Danon, L.; Youngman, B. D.; McNeall, D.

2025-05-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.05.16.25327744 medRxiv
Show abstract

Calibration of complex stochastic infectious disease models is challenging. These often have high-dimensional input and output spaces, with the models exhibiting complex, non-linear dynamics. Coupled with a paucity of necessary data, this results in a large number of non-ignorable hidden states that must be handled by the inference routine. Likelihood-based approaches to this missing data problem are very flexible, but challenging to scale, due to having to monitor and update these hidden states. Methods based on simulating the hidden states directly from the model-of-interest have an advantage that they are often more straightforward to code, and thus are easier to implement and adapt in real-time. However, these often require evaluating very large numbers of simulations, rendering them infeasible for many large-scale problems. We present a framework for using emulation-based methods to calibrate a large-scale, stochastic, age-structured, spatial meta-population model of COVID-19 transmission in England and Wales. By embedding a model discrepancy process into the simulation model, and combining this with particle filtering, we show that it is possible to calibrate complex models to high-dimensional data by emulating the log-likelihood surface instead of individual data points. The use of embedded model discrepancy also helps to alleviate other key challenges, such as the introduction of infection across space and time. We conclude with a discussion of major challenges remaining and key areas for future work.

Published in PLOS Computational Biology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

PLOS Computational Biology · published here
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
30.7%
2
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
11
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
14
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%