Back

On real-time calibrated prediction for complex model-based decision support in pandemics: Part 1

Williamson, D. B.; McKinley, T.; Xiong, X.; Salter, J. M.; Challen, R.; Danon, L.; Youngman, B. D.; McNeall, D.

2025-05-19 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.05.16.25327688 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWInfectious disease models are used to predict the spread and impact of outbreaks of a disease. Like other complex models, they have parameters that need to be calibrated, and structural discrepancies from the reality that they simulate that should be accounted for in calibration and prediction. Whilst Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) techniques have been applied to infectious disease models before, they were not routinely used to inform policymakers in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we will argue that during a fast moving pandemic, models and policy are changing on timescales that make traditional UQ methods impractical, if not impossible to implement. We present an alternative formulation to the calibration problem that embeds model discrepancy within the structure of the model, and appropriately assimilates data within the simulation. We then show how UQ can be used to calibrate the model in real-time to produce disease trajectories accounting for parameter uncertainty and model discrepancy. We apply these ideas to an age-structured COVID-19 model for England and demonstrate the types of information it could have produced to feed into policy support prior to the lockdown of March 2020.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
2
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
5
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
6
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.3%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
9
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
10
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
22
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
23
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%