Back

On real-time calibrated prediction for complex model-based decision support in pandemics: Part 1

Williamson, D. B.; McKinley, T.; Xiong, X.; Salter, J. M.; Challen, R.; Danon, L.; Youngman, B. D.; McNeall, D.

2025-05-19 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.05.16.25327688 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWInfectious disease models are used to predict the spread and impact of outbreaks of a disease. Like other complex models, they have parameters that need to be calibrated, and structural discrepancies from the reality that they simulate that should be accounted for in calibration and prediction. Whilst Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) techniques have been applied to infectious disease models before, they were not routinely used to inform policymakers in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we will argue that during a fast moving pandemic, models and policy are changing on timescales that make traditional UQ methods impractical, if not impossible to implement. We present an alternative formulation to the calibration problem that embeds model discrepancy within the structure of the model, and appropriately assimilates data within the simulation. We then show how UQ can be used to calibrate the model in real-time to produce disease trajectories accounting for parameter uncertainty and model discrepancy. We apply these ideas to an age-structured COVID-19 model for England and demonstrate the types of information it could have produced to feed into policy support prior to the lockdown of March 2020.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
26
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%