Boring beetles and super models: mapping the distribution of a new invader
Coates, A.; Phillips, B. L.
Show abstract
The impact of an invasive species is strongly influenced by the extent of its invaded range. Predicting the potential distribution of an invader is thus critical for informing decisions around surveillance, containment, and eradication. Such predictions ideally would come from a mechanistic species distribution model. These models directly describe how aspects of the environment affect organismal fitness, and may also provide insight into population dynamics, such as rates of population growth and spread. Here, we develop a temperature-dependent stage-structured population dynamic model for a globally significant invader, the polyphagous shot-hole borer (PSHB, Euwallacea fornicatus). We use this model to predict the beetles potential growth rate across its invaded range. Invasive PSHB causes serious damage to urban and agricultural trees, and so the continued expansion of its global distribution is a major concern. We synthesise previous studies to parameterise the model, yielding estimates of population growth as a function of daily temperatures within a host tree. We ran the model over one year using daily climate data across regions with invasive PSHB populations: South Africa, California, Israel and Australia. Our potential distribution maps indicate that PSHB currently occupies the most climatically suitable parts of California and Israel, but is yet to invade the most suitable regions in Australia and South Africa. The model shows the species is capable of very high population growth: in already-invaded locations, the average daily growth rate had an upper bound of [~] 0.05 (equivalent to population doubling in 14 days). Growth predictions were sensitive to the parameter for adult female mortality during between-host dispersal. This is an uncertain parameter (there is very little data available), but we estimated that for current populations to persist, the loss through dispersal mortality needs to be < 40%. We use our model to predict the maximum spread rate of PSHB (discounting transport by humans) to be 3 km/year. Our model provides insights into the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of invasion risk, which will assist global efforts to manage the ongoing invasion of this species.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting fine-scale distributions and emergent spatiotemporal patterns from temporally dynamic step selection simulations 94%
- Inferring wildlife poaching in Southeast Asia with multispecies dynamic site-occupancy models 94%
- Projecting spatiotemporal bioclimatic niche dynamics of endemic Pyrenean plant species under climate change: how much will we lose? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insecticide resistance management strategies for public health control of mosquitoes exhibiting polygenic resistance: a comparison of sequences, rotations, and mixtures. 93%
- Populations of the Australian saltmarsh mosquito Aedes vigilax vary between panmixia and temporally stable local genetic structure 92%
- Mathematical modeling of genetic pest management through female-specific lethality: Is one locus better than two? 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using simulated temperature regimes to test growth and development of an invasive forest insect under climate change 93%
- Forecasting the Effects of Global Change on a Bee Biodiversity Hotspot 93%
- Autumn larval cold tolerance does not predict the northern range limit of a widespread butterfly species 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mountain pine beetle spread in forests with varying host resistance 95%
- Managed culls mean extinction for a marine mammal population when combined with extreme climate impacts 94%
- Estimating the fundamental niche: accounting for the uneven availability of existing environmental conditions in the calibration area 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.