Breathing strategies to influence perception: Evidence for interoceptive and exteroceptive active sensing
della Penna, F.; Zaccaro, A.; Bayram, B.; Bubbico, F.; Perrucci, M. G.; Costantini, M.; Ferri, F.
Show abstract
Recent research indicates that humans continuously and automatically modulate their breathing to temporally align exteroceptive stimuli with specific phases of the respiratory cycle. This process has been interpreted as a form of active sensing and is associated with faster responses and improved perceptual accuracy. While converging evidence suggests that respiration also shapes interoceptive processing at both neural and behavioural levels, it remains unclear whether individuals actively adjust their breathing to optimize interoceptive performance. In this study, we examined whether healthy participants modulated their respiration during an interoceptive (heartbeat discrimination) and an exteroceptive (tactile detection) task. We analysed respiration both in terms of time-locked activity and inter-trial phase coherence relative to stimulus onset and assessed their relationship with perceptual accuracy. Our results demonstrated that participants systematically adjust their breathing in both amplitude and phase, synchronizing respiration to the anticipated (i.e., cued) onset of stimuli in both tasks. Crucially, task performance was enhanced during exhalation compared to inhalation, suggesting that respiratory modulation supports the perception of both interoceptive and exteroceptive signals. Significance statementThis study reveals that humans not only synchronize their breathing to anticipated external and internal stimuli, but also perform better when perceiving them during exhalation. By showing that respiration is modulated in both interoceptive and exteroceptive contexts, our findings extend the concept of active sensing to internal bodily awareness. This has important implications for understanding the dynamic interplay between physiology and perception and may guide interventions aimed at improving clinical outcomes in conditions where interoception is disrupted.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the Functional Roles of Pre-Stimulus Oscillations in Crossmodal Associative Memory Formation via Sensory Entrainment 94%
- Sound perception in realistic surgery scenarios: Towards EEG-based auditory work strain measures for medical personnel. 93%
- Bayesian Prior Uncertainty and Surprisal Elicit Distinct Neural Patterns During Sound Localization in Dynamic Environments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain-heart interactions are optimized across the respiratory cycle via interoceptive attention 96%
- Cardio-respiratory interactions in interoceptive perception: The role of heartbeat-modulated cortical oscillations 94%
- Sustained neural activity correlates with rapid perceptual learning of auditory patterns 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- M1 disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices 93%
- EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning 93%
- The thermoception task: a thermal-imaging based procedure for measuring awareness of changes in peripheral body temperature 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Respiration facilitates behaviour during multisensory integration 94%
- Trial-wise exposure to visual appetitive cues increases physiological arousal but not temporal discounting. 93%
- Sensory suppression and increased neuromodulation during actions disrupt memory encoding of unpredictable self-initiated stimuli 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.