Back

An artefact-resilient wide bandwidth bidirectional graphene neural interface

Prokop, M.; Esparza-Iaizzo, M.; Masvidal-Codina, E.; Codadu, N. K.; Rathore, D.; Ria, N.; Kostarelos, K.; del Corro, E.; Garcia-Cortadella, R.; Wykes, R. C.; Guimera-Brunet, A.; Garrido, J. A.

2025-05-20 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.15.653988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to simultaneously record and modulate neural activity is critical for next-generation bidirectional neural interfaces aiming to enable adaptive neuromodulation therapies for neurological disorders. Active graphene transistor technologies are particularly promising for neural recordings, as they extend the ability to monitor brain activity at very low frequencies and support multiplexed operation for high-density neural interfaces. However, their limited charge injection capacity makes them unsuitable for stimulation. In this work, we present a bidirectional neural interface that combines nanoporous reduced graphene oxide (rGO) microelectrodes for high charge injection focal stimulation and graphene solution-gated field-effect transistors (gSGFETs) for brain activity monitoring, exploiting the advantages of both technologies in one single device. Using scalable cleanroom microfabrication techniques, we monolithically integrate these two graphene-based technologies into fully flexible probes. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid devices both in saline and in vivo, with a particular focus on transistor performance during stimulation. Our results demonstrate that the recording capability of this bidirectional neural interface, including the monitoring of infraslow and local field potential activity, is not compromised during stimulation. This work highlights the potential of this hybrid neural interface for both basic neurophysiological and clinical translation use.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.