Macroevolutionary Rates of Species Interactions: Approximate Bayesian Inference from Cophylogenies
Zeng, Y.; Roman-Palacios, C.
Show abstract
Understanding the macroevolutionary dynamics of species interactions such as parasitisms, commen-salisms, and mutualisms is an important goal in evolutionary ecology. To this end, statistical inference from extant cophylogenetic systems holds immense potential. However, such inference cannot yet handle the speciation-extinction dynamics that occur simultaneously in the host and symbiont clades on the same timescale. Here we present an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) approach that, while taking into account host and symbiont extinction, infers rates of four types of speciation from a cophylogenetic system: (i) host speciation, (ii) symbiont speciation without host-switching, (iii) symbiont speciation with host-switching, and (iv) cospeciation. The new ABC approach relies on a novel design of summary statistics combining both size-based (i.e., tree sizes) and size-free summary statistics (i.e., the normalized distribution of Branch Length Differences - BLenD) of the cophylogeny. Convergence analyses show that the combined design of summary statistics outperforms size-based or size-free summary statistics alone - achieving satisfactory accuracy in detecting rate heterogeneity between the four types of speciation. Our ABC approach allows the user to infer the predominant mode of speciation within a given cophylogenetic system. The approach is demonstrated with an application to a cophylogenetic dataset of commensalism, in which beetles of one genus mimic those of another. In this system, we identify host speciation as the predominant process with the fastest rate (in events per unit time) among all four types of speciation (i.e., 4.3-5.1 times faster than the median among all four types of speciation). Understanding how and why different types of speciation may predominate in different cophylogenetic systems can have implications for various areas in ecology and evolution such as host conservatism, trait-driven diversification, pathogen spillover risk, and parasite extinction risk. This new approach highlights the need and potential for future efforts to compile time-calibrated cophylogenies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating "tip fog": Embracing uncertainty in tip measurements 96%
- Disentangling the process of speciation using machine learning 94%
- Insights from a general, full-likelihood Bayesian approach to inferring shared evolutionary events from genomic data: Inferring shared demographic events is challenging 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.