Validation of a 0/2-hour high sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithm for suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department
Mark, D. G.; Kaiser Permanente CREST Network Investigators, ; Huang, J.; Lee, K. K.; Sax, D. R.; Ballard, D. W.; Vinson, D. R.; Reed, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundWe implemented a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-based algorithm for emergency department (ED) evaluation of possible non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) within an integrated health system (The Kaiser Permanente Northern California [KPNC] NSTE-ACS algorithm). MethodsRetrospective study of adult (18+ years) ED encounters for chest pain/discomfort with hs-cTnI testing (Access hsTnI, Beckman) at 21 KPNC medical centers between January 1, 2023 and June 30, 2024. Exclusion criteria were ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), leaving the ED against medical advice, lack of active KP health plan coverage, or an included encounter within 30 days prior. The primary outcome was 30-day MI or death. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and likelihood ratios (LR) were reported, with subgroup analyses by age, sex, coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and ED disposition. ResultsThere were 104,025 encounters in the final study cohort. Median age was 59 years, 45% were male, 18% had CAD, and 13% had CKD. The primary outcome occurred in 5.5% of encounters. Rule-out criteria were present in 70% of encounters with a sensitivity of 95.4% (95% CI: 94.8-96.0%), a NPV of 99.7% (95% CI: 99.6-99.7%) and an LR-of 0.05, while 7% of encounters met rule-in criteria with a specificity of 96.7% (95% CI: 96.6-96.8%), a PPV of 60.2% (95% CI: 59.3-61.1%) and an LR+ of 24.4. In subgroup analyses, rule-out criteria NPV was statistically below 99% in stage 4+ CKD (96.1%; 95% CI: 94.6-97.6%) and ischemic CAD (98.6%; 95% CI: 98.3-98.9%), though not among those selected for ED discharge (98.4%; 95% CI: 96.7-99.2% and 99.1%; 95% CI: 98.8-99.4%, respectively). ConclusionsThe KPNC NSTE-ACS evaluation algorithm demonstrated excellent overall performance. NPV was modestly diminished in ischemic CAD or advanced CKD, but this excess risk was largely mitigated by ED discharge disposition decisions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Myocardial Infarction across COVID-19 Pandemic Phases: Insights from the Veterans Health Affairs System 94%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 94%
- Artificial intelligence of arterial Doppler waveforms to predict major adverse outcomes among patients evaluated for peripheral artery disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in age, sex and racial differences in the incidence of infective endocarditis in Florida and New York 94%
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 94%
- Standardized Data Elements for Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Consensus Report from the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 95%
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 94%
- Association of Mortality and Aspirin Prescription for COVID-19 Patients at the Veterans Health Administration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of intensive care unit severity scoring systems across different ethnicities. 90%
- Predictive performance and clinical application of COV50, a urinary proteomic biomarker in early COVID-19 infection: a cohort study 90%
- Differences in estimates for ten-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Black versus white persons with identical risk factor profiles using pooled cohort equations 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.