Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Inflammatory Genes Drives Calcific Aortic Valve Disease (CAVD)
Ding, S.-Y.; Rehemuding, R.; Li, X.-L.; Li, X.-M.; Wei, X.; Yu, Z.-X.; Liu, F.; Keremu, M.; Cui, J.; Li, X.; Adi, D.; Ma, Y.-T.
Show abstract
IntroductionCalcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most common valvular disorder in older adults, characterized by progressive fibrosis, calcification, and impaired blood flow. Despite its growing burden, no effective pharmacological treatments exist. Inflammation and epigenetic dysregulation are increasingly recognized as central to CAVD pathogenesis. This study aimed to identify key inflammatory genes and regulatory mechanisms contributing to disease development. MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of aortic valve transcriptomic datasets, focusing on inflammation-related genes, to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CAVD. Blood-derived expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and DNA methylation QTL (mQTL) data were integrated with CAVD genome-wide association study (GWAS) results (FinnGen database) using a three-step summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) framework. Additionally, we combined aortic eQTL data and inflammatory mediator GWAS to assess tissue-specific regulatory interactions through SMR and co-localization analyses. ResultsFifty-seven inflammation-related DEGs were identified, enriched in immune cells from patients with CAVD. Multi-omics integration prioritized nine causal genes in blood, including PPARG, TLR2, LTA, TNF, C4A, IL6, RELA, C3, and TGF{beta}1. Among these, TNF and TGF{beta}1 were strongly associated with increased CAVD risk. In aortic tissue, SMR and co-localization analyses revealed TLR2, C4A, and AGER as key genes linked to inflammatory pathways, highlighting a potential gene-immune axis in disease progression. ConclusionsOur integrative multi-omics analysis reveals that calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is driven by genetically and epigenetically regulated inflammatory pathways. We identify TNF and TGF{beta}1 as epigenetically controlled causal drivers, while AGER, C4A, and TLR2 emerge as tissue-specific mediators of aortic inflammation. These findings establish a causal link between immune dysregulation and CAVD pathogenesis, highlighting promising targets for biomarker development and precision therapies aimed at interrupting disease progression.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Smooth muscle expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 controls activation of RNA sensor MDA5 in atherosclerosis 93%
- APOE-NOTCH Axis Governs Elastogenesis During Human Cardiac Valve Remodeling 93%
- The VE-cadherin/AmotL2 mechanosensory pathway suppresses aortic inflammation and the formation of abdominal aortic aneurysms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic association analyses highlight IL6, ALPL, and NAV1 as three new susceptibility genes underlying calcific aortic valve stenosis 96%
- Dissecting the Genetic Architecture of Intracranial Aneurysms 94%
- Cardiac imaging of aortic valve area from 26,142 UK Biobank participants reveal novel genetic associations and shared genetic comorbidity with multiple disease phenotypes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Second Heart Field-derived Cells Contribute to Angiotensin II-mediated Ascending Aortopathies 93%
- Transcriptional and Cellular Diversity of the Human Heart 93%
- High-resolution transcriptomic profiling of the heart during chronic stress reveals cellular drivers of cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of valvular function in over 47,000 people using deep learning-based flow measurements 93%
- The Genetic Determinants of Aortic Distension 92%
- Common variants near the bradykinin receptor B 2 gene are associated with angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor treatment - a genome wide association study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.