Deep Learning on Histopathological Images to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit
Shamai, G.; Cohen, S.; Binenbaum, Y.; Sabo, E.; Cretu, A.; Mayer, C.; Barshack, I.; Goldman, T.; Bar-Sela, G.; Polonia, A.; Howard, F. M.; Pearson, A. T.; Huo, D.; Sparano, J. A.; Kimmel, R.; Aran, D.
Show abstract
Genomic testing has transformed treatment decisions for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer; however, it remains inaccessible to many patients worldwide due to high costs and logistical barriers. Here, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model using a multimodal deep learning approach that estimates Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence scores (RS) from routine histopathology images and clinicopathologic variables, including age at diagnosis, tumor size, and receptor status. Using a foundation model pre-trained on 171,189 histopathological slides, we fine-tuned and validated our AI model on the TAILORx randomized trial (n=8,284). Among 2,407 patients in the TAILORx validation, the model classifies 45.6% of patients as low-risk, 42.4% as intermediate risk, and 12.0% as high-risk. For predicting high genomic risk disease (RS[≥]26), occurring in 15.9% in the TAILORx validation set, the model achieves AUC=0.898. Patient stratification by our model shows strong prognostic value across multiple clinical endpoints, including recurrence-free interval, distant recurrence-free interval, and disease-free survival. Importantly, chemotherapy benefit is demonstrated for premenopausal patients classified by our model as high AI risk and chemotherapy benefit is ruled out for postmenopausal patients classified as low AI risk. External validation across six independent cohorts (n=5,497 patients) demonstrates robust generalization of the AI model for prognostication and prediction of RS. Notably, in postmenopausal patients, the AI model reclassifies approximately 30% of clinically high-risk cases, defined by the MINDACT criteria, as low-risk. These findings demonstrate that artificial intelligence applied to standard histopathology can be a valuable tool for chemotherapy decision-making in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. This approach can help reduce unnecessary chemotherapy and extend precision medicine, particularly in resource-limited settings, where genomic testing is not widely accessible.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 97%
- Integrated radiogenomics models predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer 96%
- Integrative ensemble modelling of cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer PDXs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Omic and Multidimensional Spatial Atlas from Serial Biopsies of an Evolving Metastatic Breast Cancer 95%
- Deep Learning identifies new morphological patterns of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in luminal breast cancers from whole slide images. 95%
- Determination of permissive and restraining cancer-associated fibroblast (DeCAF) subtypes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Osteosarcoma: novel prognostic biomarkers using circulating and cell-free tumour DNA 92%
- Germline Allelic Expression of Genes at 17q22 Locus Associates with Risk of Breast Cancer 92%
- Development of an artificial intelligence-generated, explainable treatment recommendation system for urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma to support multidisciplinary cancer conferences 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Histology-based Prediction of Therapy Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinomas Using Deep Learning 95%
- Machine learning and mechanistic modeling for prediction of metastatic relapse in breast cancer 95%
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.