High prevalence of deleterious germline variants in cancer risk genes among subjects with young-onset, sporadic pituitary macroadenomas
Daly, A. F.; Sridharan, K.; Jaffrain-Rea, M.-L.; Trivellin, G.; Carbonara, F.; De Herder, W. W.; Bilbao Garay, I.; Segni, M.; Zacharin, M.; Solovey, M.; Kadian, K.; Paetow, U.; Shah, N.; Bandgar, T.; Rostomyan, L.; Neggers, S. J.; Beckers, A.; Petrossians, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionPituitary adenomas/pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are common intracranial tumors, clinically affecting 1:1000 individuals and most cases remain genetically unexplained. Emerging research has highlighted the major contribution of germline pathogenic variants to tumorigenesis across many tissue types in young subjects . We investigated whether young-onset (<30 years old) pituitary macroadenomas that were negative for known genetic causes harbor pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in cancer-risk genes. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 48 subjects (29 males; 96% GH- or PRL-secreting) with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas that were negative for known germline variants (AIP, MEN1, CDKN1B) or duplications (GPR101). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on germline DNA. Bioinformatics analysis including variant calling (for small variants and CNVs), annotation and variant prioritization were performed, using secondary analysis pipelines for WES data and AION predictor platform for tertiary analysis. Variants in established cancer-risk genes were prioritized. ResultsP/LP germline variants in cancer-risk genes were identified in 14.6% of subjects on ClinVar/ACMG criteria. This rose to 31.3% of subject with deleterious variants when additional in silico and AION predictor criteria were used. Genes included: BAP1, BRCA1, BUB1, ELAC2, FLCN, MCPH1, MSR1, MUTYH, PDE11A, POLE, POLG, PMS2, RAD51C, RECQL4, SDHA, SDHD, SEC23B, TMEM127, WRN. ConclusionsOur findings expand the spectrum of genes potentially associated with young-onset pituitary macroadenomas. The identification of a high rate of deleterious germline variants in cancer-risk genes in pituitary adenomas/PitNETs echoes similar findings in young patients across a wide range of tumors. These results may have relevance for genetic counseling and potentially could expand targeted management strategies in young patients with large pituitary tumors.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis of Pituitary Corticotroph Tumors Unveils Intratumor Heterogeneity 94%
- Thyroid hormone receptor beta inhibits the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling axis in anaplastic thyroid cancer via genomic mechanisms 90%
- In situ spatial reconstruction of distinct normal and pathological cell populations within the human adrenal gland 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Salivary profiles of 11-oxygenated androgens follow a diurnal rhythm in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia 89%
- Free cortisol and free 21-deoxycortisol in the clinical evaluation of congenital adrenal hyperplasia 89%
- Increased adipose tissue indices of androgen catabolism and aromatization in women with metabolic dysfunction 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX) protein expression in human pituitary neuroendocrine tumours and its reported correlation to prognosis and clinical outcomes: A systematic review 92%
- Characterization of p53 p.T253I as a pathogenic mutation underlying Li-Fraumeni Syndrome 90%
- Algorithmic Assessment of Missense Mutation Severity in the Von-Hippel Lindau Protein 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A RIPOR2 in-frame deletion is a frequent and highly penetrant cause of adult-onset hearing loss 88%
- Advancing in Schaaf-Yang syndrome pathophysiology: from bedside to subcellular analyses of truncated MAGEL2 87%
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.