Prg4+ fibro-adipogenic progenitors in muscle are crucial for bone fracture repair
He, Q.; Lu, J.; Liang, Q.; Yao, L.; Sun, T.; Wang, H.; Duffy, M.; Jiang, X.; Lin, Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Ahn, J.; Dyment, N.; Mourkioti, F.; Boerckel, J. D.; Qin, L.
Show abstract
Clinically, compromised fracture healing often occurs at sites with less muscle coverage and muscle flaps can provide the necessary healing environment for appropriate healing in severe bone loss. However, the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we established a mouse reporter model for studying muscle cell contribution to bone fracture repair. Analyzing skeletal muscle scRNA-seq datasets revealed that Prg4 marks a fibro-adipogenic progenitor (FAP) subpopulation. In mice, Prg4+ cells were specifically located in the skeletal muscle, but not at the periosteum or inside cortical bone. These cells expressed FAP markers, responded to muscle injury, and became periosteal cells under normal and muscle injury conditions. Fracture fragmented muscle fibers, rapidly expanded Prg4+ FAPs at the injury site and promoted their migration into the fracture site. Later, they gave rise to many chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and osteocytes in the outer periphery of callus next to muscle. In repaired bones, the descendants of Prg4+ FAPs were detected as mesenchymal progenitors in the periosteum and osteocytes at the prior fracture site. A second fracture activated those cells and stimulated them to become osteoblasts in the inner part of callus. Importantly, ablation of Prg4+ FAPs impaired fracture healing and functional repair. In an intramembranous bone injury model (drill-hole), Prg4+ FAPs became periosteal cells, but their contribution to bone defect repair was significantly less than in fractures. Taken together, we demonstrate the critical role of FAPs in endochondral bone repair and uncover a novel mechanism by which mesenchymal progenitors transform from muscle to cortical bone. Significance statementFracture healing is often impaired in areas with less muscle coverage, but the mechanisms behind this are poorly understood. In this work, we uncovered a critical role of specific muscle cells, known as Prg4+ fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs), in bone regeneration. Using mouse models, we show that these muscle-resident mesenchymal progenitors expand after bone injury, migrate to the fracture site, transform into various bone cells in the fracture callus, and eventually become bone surface progenitors after the bone is healed. This finding highlights the importance of muscle cells in endochondral fracture repair and reveals a novel crosstalk mechanism between muscle and bone tissues. Future studies targeting these muscle progenitor cells could develop new treatments for delayed and nonunion fractures.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Csf1 from marrow adipogenic precursors is required for osteoclast formation and hematopoiesis in bone 96%
- Secondary ossification center induces and protects growth plate structure 96%
- Hypertrophic Chondrocytes Serve as a Reservoir for Marrow Associated Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells, Osteoblasts, and Adipocytes During Skeletal Development 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- YAP and TAZ promote periosteal osteoblast precursor expansion and differentiation for fracture repair 97%
- Interleukin-1 is overexpressed in injured muscles following spinal cord injury and promotes neurogenic heterotopic ossification 95%
- Osteomacs support osteoclast-mediated resorption and contribute to bone pathology in a postmenopausal osteoporosis mouse model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Basigin Links Altered Skeletal Stem Cell Lineage Dynamics with Glucocorticoid-induced Bone Loss and Impaired Angiogenesis 95%
- Direct contribution of skeletal muscle mesenchymal progenitors to bone repair 95%
- Nerve Growth Factor Receptor Limits Inflammation to Promote Remodeling and Repair of Osteoarthritic Joints 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.