Back

Application of post glycosylation modifying enzymes for mass spectrometry imaging of modified N-glycans in situ.

Dreifus, J. E.; Chuzel, L.; Escobar, E. E.; Grimsley, G.; Bai, H.; Hanneman, A. J.; Fossa, S. L.; Gregory, V.; Martin, R. J.; Drake, R. R.; Foster, J.; Taron, C. H.

2025-05-15 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.05.14.654078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glycans are essential components of cells and are involved in innumerable biological processes. Their structural diversity and complexity present unique analytical challenges. Glycans are comprised of various types of monosaccharides that are linked together at different positions and with varied stereochemistry. In addition, glycans are frequently decorated with a diverse set of chemical modifications, termed post-glycosylation modifications (PGMs). Characterization of PGMs is essential for a thorough understanding of glycans, however, the technical challenges and low throughput of current methodologies have limited our understanding of these modifications. Here we demonstrate a novel approach for rapid visualization of specific PGMs present in tissue N-glycans by applying PGM-targeting enzymes to mass spectrometry imaging (MSI). The method enables in situ investigation of glycans with PGMs en masse, identifying the sugar residue and position modified, as well as visualizing the spatial distribution of each modified N-glycan in tissues. As the repertoire of PGM-targeting enzymes expands, we anticipate this approach will enable a better understanding of PGM distribution within a dynamic N-glycome. This may yield both new biological insights and the potential for identification of novel disease biomarkers.

Published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.