Using computer vision to quantify facial expressions of children with autism during naturalistic social interactions
Manelis, L.; Barami, T.; Ilan, M.; Meiri, G.; Menashe, I.; Soskin, E.; Sofer, C.; Dinstein, I.
Show abstract
BackgroundDifficulties with non-verbal communication, including atypical use of facial expressions, are a core feature of autism. Quantifying atypical use of facial expressions during naturalistic social interactions in a reliable, objective, and direct manner is difficult, but potentially possible with facial analysis computer vision algorithms that identify facial expressions in video recordings. MethodsWe analyzed >5 million video frames from 100 verbal children, 2-7-years-old (72 with autism and 28 controls), who were recorded during a [~]45-minute ADOS-2 assessment using modules 2 or 3, where they interacted with a clinician. Three different facial analysis algorithms (iMotions, FaceReader, and Py-Feat) were used to identify the presence of six facial expressions (anger, fear, sadness, surprise, disgust, and happiness) in each video frame. We then compared results across algorithms and across autism and control groups using ANCOVA analyses while controlling for the age and sex of participating children. ResultsThere were significant differences in the performance of the three facial analysis algorithms including differences in the proportion of frames identified as containing a face and frames classified as containing each of the examined facial expressions. Nevertheless, analyses across all three algorithms demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the quantity of facial expressions produced by children with autism and controls. LimitationsOur study was limited to verbal children with autism who completed ADOS-2 assessments using modules 2 and 3 and were able to sit in a stable manner while facing a wall mounted camera. In addition, this study focused on comparing the quantity of facial expressions across groups rather than their quality, timing, or social context. ConclusionsCommonly used automated facial analysis algorithms exhibit large variability in their output when identifying facial expressions of young children during naturalistic social interactions. Nonetheless, all three algorithms did not identify differences in the quantity of facial expressions across groups, suggesting that atypical production of facial expressions in verbal children with autism is likely related to their quality, timing, and social context rather than their quantity during natural social interaction.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Features for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Children using Machine Learning 95%
- Early screening of autism spectrum disorder using cry features 95%
- Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and testing of a game-based digital intervention for working memory training in autism spectrum disorder 92%
- Functional connectivity in infants' visual cortex: Links to motion processing and autism 91%
- Effectiveness of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interaction between facial expression and color in modulating ERP P3 88%
- Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners. 88%
- Strength of attention-sampling parietal EEG theta rhythm is linked to impaired inhibition in adult ADHD 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A meta-analysis of sex differences in neonatal rodent ultrasonic vocalizations and the implication for the preclinical maternal immune activation model 88%
- Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure at Birth 86%
- Menarche, pubertal timing and the brain: female-specific patterns of brain maturation beyond age-related development 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.