Arithmetic learning is associated with developmental increases in similarity between brain activity and artificial neural networks
Nakai, T.; Prado, J.
Show abstract
The ability to learn simple arithmetic is often thought to rely on the associative nature of human memory, where repeated exposure to arithmetic problems strengthens the relations between operands and outcomes. This view is reminiscent of learning in large language artificial neural networks (ANNs), where training involves statistical associations between symbolic inputs and outputs. Based on this parallel, we hypothesized that brain activity during arithmetic problem-solving should be increasingly similar to ANN-derived representations with learning and development. We used fMRI to investigate the relation between brain activity during single-digit addition problem-solving and ANN features in 104 participants across four age groups (8-, 11-, 14-year-olds, and adults). Vertex-wise encoding models were used to predict brain activity using latent features extracted from pre-trained ANNs. Results revealed that the ANN-based model better predicted arithmetic-related activity in older than younger participants in a specific region of the left precentral sulcus. Prediction accuracy was higher for smaller than larger problems, consistent with the idea that associations between problems may decrease in strength with problem size. Furthermore, ANN prediction patterns aligned with a model in which each addition problem was increasingly represented separately with age. On the one hand, these findings may support the idea that, with learning and development, some neural representations of arithmetic problems become discretely organized in memory and increasingly resemble ANN-like processing. On the other hand, the lack of relation between the ANN-based model and activity in other brain regions suggests some degree of dissimilarity between arithmetic processing in humans and ANNs, suggesting the existence of additional mechanisms for simple arithmetic learning in humans.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain functional characterization of response-code conflict in dual-tasking and its modulation by age 96%
- Context-independent scaling of neural responses to task difficulty in the multiple-demand network 96%
- Verbal semantic expertise is associated with reduced functional connectivity between left and right anterior temporal lobes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of aging on successful object encoding:Enhanced semantic representations compensate for impaired visual representations 96%
- Neural contributions to reduced fluid intelligence across the adult lifespan 96%
- Does Hemispheric Asymmetry Reduction in Older Adults (HAROLD) in motor cortex reflect compensation? 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- fMRI signals of pattern separation in the neocortex and hippocampus to non-meaningful objects and their spatial location 96%
- Multiple neural pathways to successful visual short-term memory across the adult lifespan 96%
- When Age Tips the Balance: a Dual Mechanism Affecting Hemispheric Specialization for Language 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Memory specificity is linked to repetition effects in event-related potentials across the lifespan 96%
- Growing Minds, Integrating Senses: Neural and Computational Insights into Age-related Changes in Audio-Visual and Tactile-Visual Learning in Children 96%
- Temporal dynamics of visual representations in the infant brain 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.