Back

Longitudinal single cell RNA-sequencing reveals evolution of micro- and macro-states in chronic myeloid leukemia

Frankhouser, D. E.; Zhao, D.; Fu, Y.-H.; Dey, A.; Chen, Z.; Irizarry, J.; Rangel Ambriz, J.; Branciamore, S.; O'Meally, D.; Ghoda, L.; Trent, J.; Forman, S.; MacLean, A. L.; Kuo, Y.-H.; Zhang, B.; Rockne, R. C.; Marcucci, G.

2025-05-17 systems biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.05.14.653262 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized our understanding of cancer, yet identifying meaningful disease states from single cell data remains challenging. Here, we systematically explore the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) specific information content encoded in single cell versus bulk transcriptomics to resolve this paradox and clarify how discrete disease-defining states emerge from inherently noisy single cell data. We demonstrate that, while CML single cell transcriptomes exist along continuous transcriptional microstates, clinically relevant leukemia phenotypes clearly manifest only at the pseudobulk (macrostate) level. By leveraging state-transition theory, we reveal how robust disease phenotype state-transitions are governed by cell type specific contributions. Our results establish a theoretical framework explaining why discrete disease phenotypes remain hidden at the single cell scale but emerge clearly at the aggregated macrostate level, enabling previously inaccessible biological insights into leukemia evolution. By resolving how single-cell variation aggregates into macroscopic disease states, our framework provides new insight into CML progression and offers a broadly applicable strategy for exploring disease dynamics across cancers and other complex conditions.

Published in Cancer Research · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.