Back

Low-Strength Type I Interferon Signaling Promotes CAR T-Cell Treatment Efficacy

Tang, E.; Hu, Y.; Cao, G.; Asby, N. W.; Nguyen, D.-T.; Aboelella, N. S.; Ruiz, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, L.; Chen, X.; Bishop, M. R.; Riedell, P. A.; LaBelle, J. L.; Kline, J. P.; Huang, J.

2025-05-17 immunology
10.1101/2025.05.13.653878 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has significantly advanced the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). However, up to 60% of patients do not achieve a complete response. To uncover determinants of therapeutic efficacy, we analyzed the infusion products of eight r/r DLBCL patients with distinct clinical responses to axicabtagene ciloleucel using single-cell transcriptomics. Compared to patients who exhibited progressive disease, infusion products of complete responders demonstrated enriched signatures of type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling. Based on these findings, we developed a novel strategy to improve CD19-directed CAR T-cell treatment efficacy by incorporating IFN-I as an enhancer during the ex vivo manufacturing process, with IFN-I removal before CAR T-cell infusion to avoid in vivo toxicities. For both CD28- and 4-1BB-costimulated second-generation CARs, we found that low-strength IFN-I signaling enhanced CAR T-cell cytotoxicity and treatment efficacy against B-cell lymphoma and leukemia. Our low-strength IFN-I-enhanced CAR T-cell ex vivo manufacturing approach leverages an existing FDA-approved pharmacologic agent, circumvents in vivo interferon-associated toxicities, and remains fully compatible with current CAR constructs and manufacturing workflows. Together, our results establish IFN-I as a potent and costimulation-independent enhancer of CAR T-cell efficacy and provide a translationally feasible approach to enhance CAR T-cell therapies.

Published in Cancer Immunology Research (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.