Back

Dibutyryl cyclic AMP downregulates tenascin-C in neurons and astrocytes and reduces AAV-mediated gene expression in DRG neurons

Stepankova, K.; Cimpean, A.; Smejkalova, B.; Holota, R.; Bachanova, L.; Cerny, J.; Sprincl, V.; Marekova, D.; van den Herik, J.; de Winter, F.; Jendelova, P.; Urdzikova, L. M.

2025-05-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.13.653846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) is hindered by the limited ability of axons to regenerate in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Overcoming this barrier is critical for achieving effective recovery. Axonal regeneration depends on the activation of intracellular processes like transcription factor induction, protein and lipid trafficking, and cytoskeletal remodelling. Targeting these pathways offers a promising approach for promoting neuronal repair. This study examined the combined therapeutic effects of dibutyryl-cAMP (db-cAMP), which primes neurons for growth, and integrin 9 overexpression, which supports axonal extension. Using in vitro models with dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and astrocytes, as well as an in vivo SCI model, we evaluated the potential of this approach. In vitro, the combination of db-cAMP and integrin 9 significantly enhanced neuronal growth. However, in vivo results were less consistent, with db-cAMP affecting AAV-mediated transcription and the expression of tenascin C (TnC) in neurons and astrocytes. These findings highlight the potential of modulating intracellular signalling and integrin activation but underscore the challenges posed by the complexity of the in vivo environment. Further studies are necessary to unravel these mechanisms and refine therapeutic strategies for effective SCI recovery. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=136 SRC="FIGDIR/small/653846v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1473630org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@36a8beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@80593corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6285e3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
4
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.3%
7
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
9
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
14
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Glia
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
24
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
ASN Neuro
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
27
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%